Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27790432›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Invitro Activities of Polymyxins and Rifampicin against Carbapenem Resistant

Dheepa Muthusamy, S Sudhishnaa, Appalaraju Boppe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Biology ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dheepa MuthusamyAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & ESIC Hospital , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India .
S SudhishnaaStudent, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research , Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India .
Appalaraju BoppeProfessor and Head, Department of Microbiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research , Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India .
Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction

aimTo examine the sensitivity pattern of three older antibiotics namely colistin, polymyxin B and rifampicin against carbapenem resistant MATERIALS AND

methodsHundred clinical isolates of carbapenem resistant

resultsBy Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, 78% of the carbapenem resistant strains were found to be sensitive, 12% intermediate sensitive and 10% resistant to colistin. All the isolates were sensitive to polymyxin B and 80% were resistant to rifampicin. By the VITEK automated system, 99% of the isolates were sensitive to colistin (more in number than by disk diffusion method).

conclusionPolymyxins (colistin - polymyxin E and polymyxin B) are the next choice for multidrug resistant serious nosocomial infections like those of

Indexed as

CarbapenemaseDisk diffusion testNosocomial infections

Identifiers

PMID27790432
PMCPMC5071932
OpenAlexW2529512041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.