ArticlePublic health ethics2016
Culling and the Common Good: Re-evaluating Harms and Benefits under the One Health Paradigm.
Article in Public health ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The vacuum effect in free-roaming dog management: Conceptual foundations, boundary conditions, and One Health implications.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- The Ecological Genome Project and the Promises of Ecogenomics for Society: Realising a Shared Vision as One Health.Bioethics · 2025Article
- Towards an Ethical Analysis of Research in One Health (EAROH).Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Making a living and zoonotic disease risk management in coloured broiler poultry farms in Northern Viet Nam.Agriculture and human values · 2025Article
- Improving wild animal welfare through contraception.Bioscience · 2024Article
- One Health Ethics and the Ethics of Zoonoses: A Silent Call for Global Action.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Risk Awareness and Attitude of German Farmers towards Biosecurity Measures.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Supporting One Health for Pandemic Prevention: The Need for Ethical Innovation.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2023Article
- Swine production: how sustainable is sustainability?Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022Article
- One Health: An Effective and Ethical Approach to Leptospirosis Control in Australia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
- Phylodynamic analysis of the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 epidemic in France, 2016-2017.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- A bolder One Health: expanding the moral circle to optimize health for all.One health outlook · 2021Article
- The Precautionary Principle in Zoonotic Disease Control.Public health ethics · 2021Article
- Vector-borne zoonotic blood parasites in wildlife from Ecuador: A report and systematic review.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- The Berlin principles on one health - Bridging global health and conservation.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- One Health: How Interdependence Enriches Veterinary Ethics Education.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Interspecific visitation of cattle and badgers to fomites: A transmission risk for bovine tuberculosis?Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- One Health as a moral dilemma: Towards a socially responsible zoonotic disease control.Zoonoses and public health · 2019Review
- Justice Is the Missing Link in One Health: Results of a Mixed Methods Study in an Urban City State.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One Health (OH) is a novel paradigm that recognizes that human and non-human animal health is interlinked through our shared environment. Increasingly prominent in public health responses to zoonoses, OH differs from traditional approaches to animal-borne infectious risks, because it also aims to promote the health of animals and ecological systems. Despite the widespread adoption of OH, culling remains a key component of institutional responses to the risks of zoonoses. Using the threats posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses to human and animal health, economic activity and food security as a case exemplar, we explore whether culling and other standard control measures for animal-borne infectious disease might be justified as part of OH approaches. Our central premise is that OH requires us to reformulate 'health' as universal good that is best shared across species boundaries such that human health and well-being are contingent upon identifying and meeting the relevant sets of human and non-human interests and shared dependencies. Our purpose is to further nascent discussions about the ethical dimensions of OH and begin to describe the principles around which a public health agenda that truly seeks to co-promote human and non-human health could potentially begin to be implemented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.