Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27790191›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station.

Maximilian Mora, Alexander Mahnert, Kaisa Koskinen, Manuela R Pausan, Lisa Oberauner-Wappis, Robert Krause, Alexandra K Perras, Gregor Gorkiewicz, Gabriele Berg, Christine Moissl-Eichinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Spaceflight alters host-gut microbiota interactions.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maximilian MoraDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz Austria.
Alexander MahnertInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz Austria.
Kaisa KoskinenDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, GrazAustria; BioTechMed-Graz, GrazAustria.
Manuela R PausanDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz Austria.
Lisa Oberauner-WappisDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz Austria.
Robert KrauseDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz Austria.
Alexandra K PerrasDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, GrazAustria; Department for Microbiology, University of Regensburg, RegensburgGermany.
Gregor GorkiewiczBioTechMed-Graz, GrazAustria; Department of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, GrazAustria.
Gabriele BergInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz Austria.
Christine Moissl-EichingerDepartment for Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, GrazAustria; BioTechMed-Graz, GrazAustria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor environments, where people spend most of their time, are characterized by a specific microbial community, the indoor microbiome. Most indoor environments are connected to the natural environment by high ventilation, but some habitats are more confined: intensive care units, operating rooms, cleanrooms and the international space station (ISS) are extraordinary living and working areas for humans, with a limited exchange with the environment. The purposes for confinement are different: a patient has to be protected from infections (intensive care unit, operating room), product quality has to be assured (cleanrooms), or confinement is necessary due to extreme, health-threatening outer conditions, as on the ISS. The ISS represents the most secluded man-made habitat, constantly inhabited by humans since November 2000 - and, inevitably, also by microorganisms. All of these man-made confined habitats need to be microbiologically monitored and controlled, by e.g., microbial cleaning and disinfection. However, these measures apply constant selective pressures, which support microbes with resistance capacities against antibiotics or chemical and physical stresses and thus facilitate the rise of survival specialists and multi-resistant strains. In this article, we summarize the available data on the microbiome of aforementioned confined habitats. By comparing the different operating, maintenance and monitoring procedures as well as microbial communities therein, we emphasize the importance to properly understand the effects of confinement on the microbial diversity, the possible risks represented by some of these microorganisms and by the evolution of (antibiotic) resistances in such environments - and the need to reassess the current hygiene standards.

Indexed as

built environmentconfined habitatindoormicrobiomemicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID27790191
PMCPMC5061736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.