Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27790185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2016

Worse and Worse and Worse: Essential Tremor Patients' Longitudinal Perspectives on Their Condition.

Jesús Gutierrez, Jemin Park, Olufunmilayo Badejo, Elan D Louis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Developing a Staging Scheme for Essential Tremor: A Discussion of Organizing Principles.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Progression of Essential Tremors: Illustrative Videos.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Essential tremor.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesús GutierrezDivision of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University , New Haven, CT , USA.
Jemin ParkDivision of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University , New Haven, CT , USA.
Olufunmilayo BadejoDivision of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University , New Haven, CT , USA.
Elan D LouisDivision of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Neuroepidemiology and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Clinical Pathological Study of Cognitive Impairment in Essential TremorR01NS086736 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COSENTINO, STEPHANIE ANN, LOUIS, ELAN D · 2014 to 2023
$8.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEssential tremor (ET) patients regularly inquire about their prognosis. Therefore, physicians have cause to review available medical literature for meaningful answers. Longitudinal studies are ideally suited to provide a glimpse into the evolution of tremor. Despite its high prevalence, there are surprisingly few longitudinal clinical studies of ET. Furthermore, none of them provide data from the patients' perspective. Understanding the patient vantage point is valuable as it is the starting point of personalized medicine. Given the progressive nature of ET, we hypothesized that many patients will experience an increase in symptom severity over time. However, due to a lack of clinical data, the exact nature of this progression is unclear. For example, whether patients experience a worsening at each time interval is simply not known. In this longitudinal study, we assessed whether ET patients felt that their symptoms had worsened between each follow-up evaluation and try to identify specific clinical characteristics associated with this experience.

methodsA cohort of 164 ET cases enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal research study. After a baseline in-person assessment, they received regular telephone evaluations for up to 5.25 years, beginning in 2009. During each follow-up evaluation, cases answered the question, "has your ET worsened since our last call?"

resultsTwo-thirds [104 (63.4%)] of ET cases reported worsening at one-half or more of their follow-up evaluations. Furthermore, one in four cases [44 (26.8%)] reported worsening at every follow-up evaluation. Self-reported worsening was not associated with any of the baseline clinical variables assessed, including age, gender, tremor duration, age at tremor onset, or total tremor score.

conclusionLittle has been written from the patients' perspective on progression of ET. When followed longitudinally at regular intervals, a majority of ET cases we studied reported worsening one-half or more of the time; furthermore, one in four cases reported worsening at each and every assessment, indicating that they felt they were inexorably getting worse and worse with time. That there is so much self-reported worsening in ET argues against the notion that this is a static and benign condition. It suggests that patients experience it as a condition that worsens regularly and consistently.

Indexed as

clinicalepidemiologyessential tremorlongitudinalprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27790185
PMCPMC5061994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.