Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27789972›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2016

Keele Aches and Pains Study protocol: validity, acceptability, and feasibility of the Keele STarT MSK tool for subgrouping musculoskeletal patients in primary care.

Paul Campbell, Jonathan C Hill, Joanne Protheroe, Ebenezer K Afolabi, Martyn Lewis, Ruth Beardmore, Elaine M Hay, Christian D Mallen, Bernadette Bartlam, Benjamin Saunders and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Redesigning the Care of Musculoskeletal Conditions With Lifestyle Medicine.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul CampbellArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Jonathan C HillArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Joanne ProtheroeArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Ebenezer K AfolabiArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Martyn LewisArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Ruth BeardmoreArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Elaine M HayArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Christian D MallenArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Bernadette BartlamArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Benjamin SaundersArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Danielle A van der WindtArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nadine E FosterArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Kate M DunnArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele.
Keele University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-015Department of Health RP-PG-1211-20010Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal conditions represent a considerable burden worldwide, and are predominantly managed in primary care. Evidence suggests that many musculoskeletal conditions share similar prognostic factors. Systematically assessing patient's prognosis and matching treatments based on prognostic subgroups (stratified care) has been shown to be both clinically effective and cost-effective. This study (Keele Aches and Pains Study) aims to refine and examine the validity of a brief questionnaire (Keele STarT MSK tool) designed to enable risk stratification of primary care patients with the five most common musculoskeletal pain presentations. We also describe the subgroups of patients, and explore the acceptability and feasibility of using the tool and how the tool is best implemented in clinical practice. The study design is mixed methods: a prospective, quantitative observational cohort study with a linked qualitative focus group and interview study. Patients who have consulted their GP or health care practitioner about a relevant musculoskeletal condition will be recruited from general practice. Participating patients will complete a baseline questionnaire (shortly after consultation), plus questionnaires 2 and 6 months later. A subsample of patients, along with participating GPs and health care practitioners, will be invited to take part in qualitative focus groups and interviews. The Keele STarT MSK tool will be refined based on face, discriminant, construct, and predictive validity at baseline and 2 months, and validated using data from 6-month follow-up. Patient and clinician perspectives about using the tool will be explored. This study will provide a validated prognostic tool (Keele STarT MSK) with established cutoff points to stratify patients with the five most common musculoskeletal presentations into low-, medium-, and high-risk subgroups. The qualitative analysis of patient and health care perspectives will inform practitioners on how to embed the tool into clinical practice using established general practice IT systems and clinician-support packages.

Indexed as

musculoskeletalpainpredictiveprimary careriskstratified care

Identifiers

PMID27789972
PMCPMC5072582
OpenAlexW2530836434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.