Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27789777›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit.

Yu-Yin Liu, Wen-Liang Fang, Frank Wang, Jun-Te Hsu, Chun-Yi Tsai, Keng-Hao Liu, Chun-Nan Yeh, Tse-Ching Chen, Ren-Chin Wu, Cheng-Tang Chiu and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. R1 Resection in Gastric Cancer: Marker of Tumor Biology Rather Than Surgical Failure.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Yin LiuDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Wen-Liang FangDivision of General Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Frank WangDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
Jun-Te HsuDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chun-Yi TsaiDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Keng-Hao LiuDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chun-Nan YehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Tse-Ching ChenDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ren-Chin WuDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Cheng-Tang ChiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ta-Sen YehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China tsy471027@adm.cgmh.org.tw.
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study assessed the impact of the retrieval of >25 lymph nodes (LNs) on the survival outcome of patients with advanced gastric cancer after curative-intent gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 5,386 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 1994 to 2011 were enrolled. The clinicopathological parameters and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the number of LNs examined (≤15, n = 916; 16-25, n = 1,458; and >25, n = 3,012).

resultsThe percentage of patients with >25 LNs retrieved increased from 1994 to 2011. Patients in the LN >25 group were more likely to have undergone total gastrectomy and to have a larger tumor size, poorer tumor differentiation, and advanced T and N stages. Hospital mortality among the LN ≤15, LN 16-25, and LN >25 groups was 6.1%, 2.7%, and 1.7%, respectively (p < .0001). The LN >25 group consistently exhibited the most favorable OS, in particular, with stage II disease (p = .011) when OS was stratified according to tumor stage. Similarly, the LN >25 group had significantly better OS in all nodal stages (from N1 to N3b). The discrimination power of the lymph node ratio (LNR) for the LN ≤15, LN 16-25, and LN >25 groups was 483, 766, and 1,560, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LNR was the most important prognostic factor in the LN >25 group.

conclusionRetrieving more than 25 lymph nodes during curative-intent gastrectomy substantially improved survival and survival stratification of advanced gastric cancer without compromising patient safety. The Oncologist 2017;22:97-106Implications for Practice: D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is currently the standard of surgical management of gastric cancer, which is rarely audited by a third party. The present study, one of the largest surgical series worldwide, has shown that the traditionally recognized retrieval of ≥16 LNs during curative-intent gastrectomy might not be adequate in regions in which locally advanced gastric cancers predominate. The presented data show that retrieval of >25 LNs, which more greatly mimics D2 dissection, improves long-term outcomes and survival stratification without compromising patient safety.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionPrognosisAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyGastric cancerLong‐term survivalLymph node retrieval

Identifiers

PMID27789777
PMCPMC5313276
OpenAlexW2543413008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.