Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27789776›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Chemotherapy Near the End of Life for Chinese Patients with Solid Malignancies.

Jin Sheng, Ya-Xiong Zhang, Xiao-Bo He, Wen-Feng Fang, Yun-Peng Yang, Gui-Nan Lin, Xuan Wu, Ning Li, Jing Zhang, Lin-Zhu Zhai and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jin ShengMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ya-Xiong ZhangMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Bo HeDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Feng FangMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yun-Peng YangMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gui-Nan LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, People's Republic of China.
Xuan WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Ning LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lin-Zhu ZhaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuan-Yuan ZhaoMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan HuangMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ning-Ning ZhouMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Yun ZhaoMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhangMedical Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China zhangli@sysucc.org.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CNZhongshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are increasing concerns about the negative impacts of chemotherapy near the end of life (EOL). There is discrepancy among different countries about its use, and little is known about the real-world situation in China. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at six representative hospitals across China. Adult decedents with a record of advanced solid cancer and palliative chemotherapy were consecutively screened from 2010 through 2014. The prevalence of EOL chemotherapy within the last 1 month of life was set as the primary outcome. The correlations among EOL chemotherapy, clinicopathological features, and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

resultsA total of 3,350 decedents who had had cancer were consecutively included; 2,098 (62.6%) were male and the median age was 56 years (range, 20-88). There were 177 (5.3%), 387 (11.6%), and 837 (25.0%) patients who received EOL chemotherapy within the last 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months of life, respectively. We identified inferior OS (median OS, 7.1 vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.53; p < .001), more intensive treatments (e.g., admitted to intensive care unit [ICU] in the last month of life, received cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive ventilation support), and hospital death (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.14-2.06; p = .005) among patients who received continued chemotherapy within the last month compared with those who did not. However, subgroup analyses indicated that receiving oral agents correlated with fewer ICU admissions and lower rates of in-hospital death.

conclusionThis study showed that EOL chemotherapy is commonly used in China. Intravenous chemotherapy at the EOL significantly correlated with poor outcomes and the role of oral anticancer agents warrants further investigation. The Oncologist 2017;22:53-60Implications for Practice: The role of chemotherapy toward the end of life (EOL) in patients with solid cancers is debatable. This article is believed to be the first to report the current prevalence of EOL chemotherapy in China. This study found that, compared with oral anticancer agents, intravenous chemotherapy at the EOL was significantly associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, the role of oral anticancer agents at the EOL stage deserves further investigation.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdvanced solid cancerEnd‐of‐lifePalliative chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27789776
PMCPMC5313269
OpenAlexW2541759054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.