Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27789775›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2017

Phase II and Biomarker Study of Cabozantinib in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients.

Sara M Tolaney, David R Ziehr, Hao Guo, Mei R Ng, William T Barry, Michaela J Higgins, Steven J Isakoff, Jane E Brock, Elena V Ivanova, Cloud P Paweletz and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib With or Without Ipilimumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results From Cohort 6 of the CheckMate 040 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David R ZiehrDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hao GuoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mei R NgSteele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
William T BarryDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michaela J HigginsDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven J IsakoffDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jane E BrockBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elena V IvanovaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cloud P PaweletzDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michelle K DemeoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nikhil H RamaiyaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Beth A OvermoyerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rakesh K JainSteele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric P WinerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dan G DudaSteele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Role of SDF1a pathway in prostate cancer relapse and metastasis post-radiotherapyR01CA159258 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DUDA, DAN GABRIEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, no targeted therapies are available for metastatic triplenegative breast cancer (mTNBC). We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of response to cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor, in patients with mTNBC. We conducted a single arm phase II and biomarker study that enrolled patients with measurable mTNBC. Patients received cabozantinib (60 mg daily) on a 3-week cycle and were restaged after 6 weeks and then every 9 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Predefined secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and tissue and blood circulating cell and protein biomarkers. Of 35 patients who initiated protocol therapy, 3 (9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2, 26]) achieved a partial response (PR). Nine patients achieved stable disease (SD) for at least 15 weeks, and thus the clinical benefit rate (PR+SD) was 34% [95% CI: 19, 52]. Median PFS was 2.0 months [95% CI: 1.3, 3.3]. The most common toxicities were fatigue, diarrhea, mucositis, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. There were no grade 4 toxicities, but 12 patients (34%) required dose reduction. Two patients had TNBCs with MET amplification. During cabozantinib therapy, there were significant and durable increases in plasma placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF-D, stromal cell-derived factor 1a, and carbonic anhydrase IX, and circulating CD3 + cells and CD8 + T lymphocytes, and decreases in plasma soluble VEGF receptor 2 and CD14+ monocytes (all p < .05). Higher baseline concentrations of soluble MET (sMET) associated with longer PFS (p = .03). In conclusion, cabozantinib showed encouraging safety and efficacy signals but did not meet the primary endpoint in pretreated mTNBC. Exploratory analyses of circulating biomarkers showed that cabozantinib induces systemic changes consistent with activation of the immune system and antiangiogenic activity, and that sMET should be further evaluated a potential biomarker of response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)-a disease with a dearth of effective therapies-often overexpress MET, which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, clinical studies of agents targeting MET and VEGF pathways-alone or in combination-have shown disappointing results. This study of cabozantinib (a dual VEGFR2/MET) in metastatic TNBC, while not meeting its prespecified endpoint, showed that treatment is associated with circulating biomarker changes, and is active in a subset of patients. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that cabozantinib therapy induces a systemic increase in cytotoxic lymphocyte populations and a decrease in immunosuppressive myeloid populations. This supports the testing of combinations of cabozantinib with immunotherapy in future studies in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnilidesBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisPlacenta Growth FactorProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metPyridinesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnilidesBiomarkers, TumorcabozantinibKDR protein, humanMET protein, humanPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metPyridinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor DVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2VEGFD protein, humanCabozantinibLymphocytesSoluble METTriple‐negative breast cancerVascular endothelial growth factor receptor

Identifiers

PMID27789775
PMCPMC5313267
OpenAlexW2542081802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.