Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27789215›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2017

Autophagy: In the cROSshairs of cancer.

Heather Graham Hambright, Rita Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heather Graham HambrightDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Rita GhoshDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, South Texas Research Facility Campus, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. Electronic address: ghoshr@uthscsa.edu.

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Institutional Research Training GrantT32DE014318 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Kenneth M Hargreaves · 2002 to 2026
$12.1M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR001118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Oxidative stress in prostate cancer: Efficacy of antioxidants in Nkx3.1; Pten modR01CA149516 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI GHOSH, RITA · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthTL1TR001119 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$640k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001118NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001119NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149516NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE014318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two prominent features of tumors that contribute to oncogenic survival signaling are redox disruption, or oxidative stress phenotype, and high autophagy signaling, making both phenomena ideal therapeutic targets. However, the relationship between redox disruption and autophagy signaling is not well characterized and the clinical impact of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating chemotherapeutics on autophagy merits immediate attention as autophagy largely contributes to chemotherapeutic resistance. In this commentary we focus on melanoma, using it as an example to provide clarity to current literature regarding the roles of autophagy and redox signaling which can be applicable to initiation and maintenance of most tumor types. Further, we address the crosstalk between ROS and autophagy signaling during pharmacological intervention and cell fate decisions. We attempt to elucidate the role of autophagy in regulating cell fate following treatment with ROS-generating agents in preclinical and clinical settings and discuss the emerging role of autophagy in cell fate decisions and as a cell death mechanism. We also address technical aspects of redox and autophagy evaluation in experimental design and data interpretation. Lastly, we present a provocative view of the clinical relevance, emerging challenges in dual targeting of redox and autophagy pathways for therapy, and the future directions to be addressed in order to advance both basic and translational aspects of this field.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsAntioxidantsApoptosisHumansHydrazinesMelanomaMolecular Targeted TherapyOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionAntioxidantselesclomolHydrazinesReactive Oxygen SpeciesAutophagyCancerCell fateReactive oxygen speciesTherapy

Identifiers

PMID27789215
PMCPMC5322764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.