ReviewZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology2016
[Research advances in withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients].
Review in Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Progress of therapeutic vaccinations for chronic hepatitis B].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021Article
- [Off-treatment responses and predictors and after long-term anti-HBV therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients has always been a clinical problem for scholars and patients. Many studies showed that the withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues often leads to a high recurrence rate in clinical practice. The factors such as age, baseline HBV DNA load, time of drug consolidation therapy, and HBsAg level are associated with recurrence after withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues. In addition, there are many studies on safety after withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues and response to retreatment after recurrence. This article reviews the research advances in the aspects mentioned above.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.