Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27788686›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Factors associated with study attrition in a pilot randomised controlled trial to explore the role of exercise-assisted reduction to stop (EARS) smoking in disadvantaged groups.

T P Thompson, C J Greaves, R Ayres, P Aveyard, F C Warren, R Byng, R S Taylor, J L Campbell, M Ussher, S Michie and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T P ThompsonPlymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK. tom.thompson@plymouth.ac.uk.
C J GreavesUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
R AyresPlymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.
P AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
F C WarrenUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
R ByngPlymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.
R S TaylorUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
J L CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
M UssherInstitute of Population Health Research, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.
S MichieResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK.
R WestHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.
A H TaylorPlymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14135Department of Health 07/78/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudy attrition has the potential to compromise a trial's internal and external validity. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with participant attrition in a pilot trial of the effectiveness of a novel behavioural support intervention focused on increasing physical activity to reduce smoking, to inform the methods to reduce attrition in a definitive trial.

methodsDisadvantaged smokers who wanted to reduce but not quit were randomised (N = 99), of whom 61 (62 %) completed follow-up assessments at 16 weeks. Univariable logistic regression was conducted to determine the effects of intervention arm, method of recruitment, and participant characteristics (sociodemographic factors, and lifestyle, behavioural and attitudinal characteristics) on attrition, followed by multivariable logistic regression on those factors found to be related to attrition.

resultsParticipants with low confidence to quit, and who were undertaking less than 150 mins of moderate and vigorous physical activity per week at baseline were less likely to complete the 16-week follow-up assessment. Exploratory analysis revealed that those who were lost to follow-up early in the trial (i.e., by 4 weeks), compared with those completing the study, were younger, had smoked for fewer years and had lower confidence to quit in the next 6 months. Participants who recorded a higher expired air carbon monoxide reading at baseline were more likely to drop out late in the study, as were those recruited via follow-up telephone calls. Multivariable analyses showed that only completing less than 150 mins of physical activity retained any confidence in predicting attrition in the presence of other variables.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that those who take more effort to be recruited, are younger, are heavier smokers, have less confidence to quit, and are less physically active are more likely to withdraw or be lost to follow-up.

Indexed as

Cultural DeprivationPatient CompliancePatient DropoutsPovertyAdultAge FactorsBehavior TherapyEnglandExercise TherapyFemaleHarm ReductionHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMotivationDrop outHarm reductionPhysical activityRetentionSmoking reduction

Identifiers

PMID27788686
PMCPMC5084338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.