Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27788484›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

Association of Vitamin D receptor Fok I polymorphism with the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Shaosan Kang, Yansheng Zhao, Jian Liu, Lei Wang, Geng Zhao, Xi Chen, Anliang Yao, Liguo Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Xiaoqiang Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Vitamin D receptorOncotarget · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Vitamin D Receptor Signaling and Cancer.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaosan KangDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Yansheng ZhaoDepartment of Imaging, KaiLuan General Hosptial, Tangshan 063000, China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Geng ZhaoDepartment of Urology, KaiLuan General Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Anliang YaoDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Liguo ZhangDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Xiaojun ZhangDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
Xiaoqiang LiDepartment of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China.
North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital · CNKailuan General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several previous studies have been reported to examine the association between Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene Fok I polymorphism and susceptibility to prostate cancer (PCa), however the results remain inconclusive. To provide a relatively comprehensive account of the association, we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang for eligible studies and carry out this meta-analysis. A total of 27 case-control studies with 10,486 cases and 10,400 controls were included. In the overall analysis, Fok I polymorphism was not significantly associated with the susceptibility to PCa. Subgroup analyses showed that significantly association was existed in Caucasian population, the subgroup of population-based controls and the stratified group with advanced tumor.These results indicate that the VDR Fok I polymorphism might be capable of causing PCa susceptibility and could be a promising target to forecast the PCa risk for clinical practice. However further well-designed epidemiologic studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, CalcitriolRisk FactorsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specificendodeoxyribonuclease FokIReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanFok Imeta-analysispolymorphismsprostate cancerVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID27788484
PMCPMC5363628
OpenAlexW2539102146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.