Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27788239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Interaction between Darunavir and Etravirine Is Partly Mediated by CYP3A5 Polymorphism.

Leïla Belkhir, Laure Elens, Francis Zech, Nadtha Panin, Anne Vincent, Jean Cyr Yombi, Bernard Vandercam, Vincent Haufroid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leïla BelkhirAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laure ElensLouvain centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Francis ZechAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Nadtha PaninLouvain centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne VincentAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean Cyr YombiAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard VandercamAIDS Reference Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Vincent HaufroidLouvain centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of the loss-of-function CYP3A5*3 allele (rs776746, 6986A>G SNP) on darunavir (DRV) plasma concentrations.

methods135 HIV-1 infected patients treated with DRV-based therapy were included in the study and plasma samples were obtained immediately before drug intake in order to determine DRV trough concentrations using an ultra performance liquid chromatography method (UPLC) with diode-array detection (DAD). Noteworthy is the fact that in 16 (11.9%) patients, etravirine (ETR) was combined with DRV. CYP3A5 genotypes were determined using real time PCR method (TaqMan® genotyping assay). The patients were then classified into CYP3A5 expressors (CYP3A5*1 allele carriers) and non-expressors (CYP3A5*3 homozygous). Subsequently, the association between DRV plasma trough concentration ([DRV]plasma) and CYP3A5 genotype-based expression status was analyzed.

results45% of the patients were classified as CYP3A5 expressors. In the whole cohort, mean [DRV]plasma was not different between CYP3A5 expressors and non-expressors (1894ng/ml [CI95%: 1566-2290] versus 1737ng/ml [CI95%: 1468-2057], p = 0.43). However, in the subgroup of the 16 patients receiving DRV combined with ETR, a significantly lower [DRV]plasma was observed for CYP3A5 expressors when compared to non-expressors (1385ng/ml [CI95%:886.3-2165] versus 3141ng/ml [CI95%:2042-4831], p = 0.007).

conclusionsInteraction between DRV and ETR is partly mediated by CYP3A5 polymorphism with lower DRV plasma trough concentrations in CYP3A5 expressors suggesting a specific ETR-driven CYP3A5 activation only in CYP3A5 expressors. Consequently, these patients might be more at risk of infra-therapeutic [DRV]plasma. This potentially important observation is a good illustration of a genotype-based drug interaction, which could also have considerable consequences if translated to other CYP3A5-metabolized drugs. Further investigations are thus needed to confirm this association and to explore its clinical impact, mainly in the African population among whom CYP3A5 expressors are more frequent, before recommending systematic CYP3A5 pre-emptive genotyping for DRV-ETR co-administration.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdultCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADarunavirDrug InteractionsFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyridazinesPyrimidinesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADarunaviretravirineHIV Protease InhibitorsNitrilesPyridazinesPyrimidinesReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27788239
PMCPMC5082792
OpenAlexW2546277117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.