ReviewMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2016
Is failed predictive control a risk factor for focal dystonia?
Review in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTask-specific focal dystonia (TSFD) is a disorder marked by degraded coordination in complex and exacting psychomotor tasks, such as musical performance. Its development is associated with prolonged and intensive practice of these tasks, but the etiology of TSFD is still unknown. The prevailing hypothesis was informed by findings in primates following repetitive simple grasping actions. This model implies, however, that complex manual tasks that yield more intricate and subtly varying sensorimotor patterns, as found in musical performance and handwriting, should be unlikely to lead to focal dystonia. HYPOTHESIS: We propose an alternative, "predictive-control" etiological hypothesis: When an overtaxed performer exhibits poorly controlled variability and errors in motor execution of a well-learned, high-precision task, predictive control processes deteriorate. This includes, in particular, those related to the formation or updating of a forward dynamic model that maps motor commands to predicted end-effector state, e.g. position and velocity of a key-pressing digit.
conclusionBased on a critical literature review we argue that this results in the characteristic signs of focal dystonia, such as freezing, halting and inappropriate co-contraction specific to the task. Directions for future research are briefly discussed. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.