Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27787917›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2017

Quantitative comparison of cortical bone thickness using correspondence-based shape modeling in patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Penny R Atkins, Shireen Y Elhabian, Praful Agrawal, Michael D Harris, Ross T Whitaker, Jeffrey A Weiss, Christopher L Peters, Andrew E Anderson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MASSM: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Anatomy Statistical Shape Modeling Directly From Images.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 6, 2024, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2024 : Marrakech, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
  5. Ankle osteoarthritis: Toward new understanding and opportunities for prevention and intervention.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Review
  6. OPTIMIZATION-DRIVEN STATISTICAL MODELS OF ANATOMIES USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION SHAPE REPRESENTATION.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024
    Article
  7. Particle-Based Shape Modeling for Arbitrary Regions-of-Interest.Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2023 : Vancouver, B.C.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Image2SSM: Reimagining Statistical Shape Models from Images with Radial Basis Functions.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  10. Can point cloud networks learn statistical shape models of anatomies?Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Statistical shape model of the talus bone morphology: A comparison between impinged and nonimpinged ankles.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From Images to Probabilistic Anatomical Shapes: A Deep Variational Bottleneck Approach.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022
    Article
  17. Spatiotemporal Cardiac Statistical Shape Modeling: A Data-Driven Approach.Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart. STACOM (Workshop) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Penny R AtkinsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Shireen Y ElhabianScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Praful AgrawalScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Michael D HarrisProgram of Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63110.
Ross T WhitakerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Jeffrey A WeissDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Christopher L PetersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
Andrew E AndersonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112.
University of Utah · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Population-Based Shape and Biomechanical Analysis of Hip PathoanatomyR01EB016701 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
Musculoskeletal and Finite Element Modeling of Femoroacetabular ImpingementR21AR063844 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANDERSON, ANDREW EDWARD · 2013 to 2014
$349k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR063844NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016701NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proximal femur is abnormally shaped in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Impingement may elicit bone remodeling at the proximal femur, causing increases in cortical bone thickness. We used correspondence-based shape modeling to quantify and compare cortical thickness between cam patients and controls for the location of the cam lesion and the proximal femur. Computed tomography images were segmented for 45 controls and 28 cam-type FAI patients. The segmentations were input to a correspondence-based shape model to identify the region of the cam lesion. Median cortical thickness data over the region of the cam lesion and the proximal femur were compared between mixed-gender and gender-specific groups. Median [interquartile range] thickness was significantly greater in FAI patients than controls in the cam lesion (1.47 [0.64] vs. 1.13 [0.22] mm, respectively; p < 0.001) and proximal femur (1.28 [0.30] vs. 0.97 [0.22] mm, respectively; p < 0.001). Maximum thickness in the region of the cam lesion was more anterior and less lateral (p < 0.001) in FAI patients. Male FAI patients had increased thickness compared to male controls in the cam lesion (1.47 [0.72] vs. 1.10 [0.19] mm, respectively; p < 0.001) and proximal femur (1.25 [0.29] vs. 0.94 [0.17] mm, respectively; p < 0.001). Thickness was not significantly different between male and female controls. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Studies of non-pathologic cadavers have provided guidelines regarding safe surgical resection depth for FAI patients. However, our results suggest impingement induces cortical thickening in cam patients, which may strengthen the proximal femur. Thus, these previously established guidelines may be too conservative. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1743-1753, 2017.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCone-Beam Computed TomographyCortical BoneFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementFemurHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbonedisease processFAI and morphologystatistics

Identifiers

PMID27787917
PMCPMC5407942
OpenAlexW2543142405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.