Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27787873›Full record

Trial reportCancer2017

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a bladder cancer biomarker: Assessing prognostic and predictive value in SWOG 8710.

Eric Ojerholm, Andrew Smith, Wei-Ting Hwang, Brian C Baumann, Kai N Tucker, Seth P Lerner, Ronac Mamtani, Ben Boursi, John P Christodouleas

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric OjerholmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-9559
Andrew SmithBiostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Wei-Ting HwangBiostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian C BaumannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kai N TuckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Seth P LernerUrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ronac MamtaniMedical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ben BoursiMedical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John P ChristodouleasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification is a major challenge in bladder cancer (BC), and a biomarker is needed. Multiple studies have reported the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a promising candidate; however, these analyses have methodological limitations. Therefore, the authors performed a category B biomarker study to test whether NLR is prognostic for overall survival (OS) after curative treatment or is predictive for the survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

methodsThis study is an unplanned secondary analysis of SWOG 8710, a randomized phase 3 trial that assessed cystectomy with or without NAC in 317 patients with muscle-invasive BC. NLR was calculated from prospectively collected complete blood counts. For the prognostic analysis, 230 patients were identified; for the predictive analysis, 263 were identified. NLR was evaluated with proportional hazards models including prespecified factors (age, sex, T-stage, lymphovascular invasion, and treatment arm).

resultsWith a median follow-up of 18.6 years, there were 172 and 205 deaths in the prognostic and predictive cohorts, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, NLR was not prognostic for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.11; P = .24). Furthermore, NLR did not predict for the OS benefit from NAC (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14; P = .86). Factors associated with worse OS were older age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07; P < .001) and surgery without NAC (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.03-1.88; P = .03).

conclusionsThis is the first analysis of NLR in BC to use prospectively collected clinical trial data. In contrast to previous studies, it suggests that NLR is neither a prognostic nor predictive biomarker for OS in muscle-invasive BC. Cancer 2017;123:794-801. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Blood Cell CountPrognosisAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeutrophilsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerbladder cancerneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

Identifiers

PMID27787873
PMCPMC5319875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.