Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27786737›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2017

Assessment of fungal diversity in a water-damaged office building.

Brett J Green, Angela R Lemons, Yeonmi Park, Jean M Cox-Ganser, Ju-Hyeong Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fungi and Atopy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  11. Recovery of Fungal Cells from Air Samples: a Tale of Loss and Gain.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Emerging Insights into the Occupational Mycobiome.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brett J Greena Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Angela R Lemonsa Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Yeonmi Parkb Field Studies Branch, Respiratory Health Division , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Jean M Cox-Ganserb Field Studies Branch, Respiratory Health Division , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Ju-Hyeong Parkb Field Studies Branch, Respiratory Health Division , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Morgantown , West Virginia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have described fungal communities in indoor environments using gene sequencing-based approaches. In this study, dust-borne fungal communities were elucidated from a water-damaged office building located in the northeastern region of the United States using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rRNA gene sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 mg of floor dust derived from 22 samples collected from either the lower floors (n = 8) or a top floor (n = 14) of the office building. ITS gene sequencing resolved a total of 933 ITS sequences and was clustered into 216 fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Analysis of fungal OTUs at the 97% similarity threshold showed a difference between the lower and top floors that was marginally significant (p = 0.049). Species richness and diversity indices were reduced in the lower floor samples compared to the top floor samples and there was a high degree of compositional dissimilarity within and between the two different areas within the building. Fungal OTUs were placed in the phyla Ascomycota (55%), Basidiomycota (41%), Zygomycota (3%), Glomeromycota (0.4%), Chytridiomycota (0.3%), and unassigned fungi (0.5%). The Ascomycota classes with the highest relative abundances included the Dothideomycetes (30%) and Eurotiomycetes (16%). The Basidiomycota consisted of the classes Ustilaginomycetes (14%), Tremellomycetes (11%), and Agaricomycetes (8%). Sequence reads derived from the plant pathogen Ustilago syntherismae were the most abundant in the analysis as were obligate Basidiomycota yeast species that accounted for 12% and 11% of fungal ITS sequences, respectively. ITS gene sequencing provides additional insight into the diversity of fungal OTUs. These data further highlight the contribution of fungi placed in the phylum Basidiomycota, obligate yeasts, as well as xerophilic species that are typically not resolved using traditional culture methods.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDNA, FungalDustEnvironmental MonitoringFungiGenes, FungalSequence Analysis, DNADNA, FungalDustExposure assessmentfungusgene sequencingoccupationaloffice building

Identifiers

PMID27786737
PMCPMC6314010
OpenAlexW2540687153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.