Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27786335›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2016

How Physician Perspectives on E-Prescribing Evolve over Time. A Case Study Following the Transition between EHRs in an Outpatient Clinic.

Erika L Abramson, Vaishali Patel, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Rainu Kaushal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  7. How Physicians Renew Electronic Prescriptions in Primary Care: Therapeutic Decision or Technical Task?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika L AbramsonErika Abramson, MD, MS, Departments of Pediatrics and Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Rm M 610A, New York, NY 10065, Tel: 212-746-3929, Fax: 212-746-3140, Email: err9009@med.cornell.edu.
Vaishali Patel
Elizabeth R Pfoh
Rainu Kaushal

Funding

Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Transmission of Discharge Medication Lists R18HS017029 · AHRQ · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KAUSHAL, RAINU · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians are expending tremendous resources transitioning to new electronic health records (EHRs), with electronic prescribing as a key functionality of most systems. Physician dissatisfaction post-transition can be quite marked, especially initially. However, little is known about how physicians' experiences using new EHRs for e-prescribing evolve over time. We previously published a qualitative case study about the early physician experience transitioning from an older to a newer, more robust EHR, in the outpatient setting, focusing on their perceptions of the electronic prescribing functionality.

objectiveOur current objective was to examine how perceptions about using the new HER evolved over time, again with a focus on electronic prescribing.

methodsWe interviewed thirteen internists at an academic medical center-affiliated ambulatory care clinic who transitioned to the new EHR two years prior. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze semi-structured interviews and generate key themes.

resultsWe identified five themes: efficiency and usability, effects on safety, ongoing training requirements, customization, and competing priorities for the EHR. We found that for even experienced e-prescribers, achieving prior levels of perceived prescribing efficiency took nearly two years. Despite the fact that speed in performing prescribing-related tasks was highly important, most were still not utilizing system short cuts or customization features designed to maximize efficiency. Alert fatigue remained common. However, direct transmission of prescriptions to pharmacies was highly valued and its benefits generally outweighed the other features considered poorly designed for physician workflow.

conclusionsEnsuring that physicians are able to do key prescribing tasks efficiently is critical to the perceived value of e-prescribing applications. However, successful transitions may take longer than expected and e-prescribing system features that do not support workflow or require constant upgrades may further prolong the process. Additionally, as system features continually evolve, physicians may need ongoing training and support to maintain efficiency.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersElectronic Health RecordsElectronic PrescribingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansEHRe-prescribingPhysician perspectivetransition

Identifiers

PMID27786335
PMCPMC5228140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.