Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785878›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2017

Epidermal grafting for wound healing: a review on the harvesting systems, the ultrastructure of the graft and the mechanism of wound healing.

Muholan Kanapathy, Nadine Hachach-Haram, Nicola Bystrzonowski, John T Connelly, Edel A O'Toole, David L Becker, Afshin Mosahebi, Toby Richards

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muholan KanapathyDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Nadine Hachach-HaramLondon Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
Nicola BystrzonowskiLondon Wound Healing Group, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
John T ConnellyCentre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, The Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Edel A O'TooleCentre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, The Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
David L BeckerLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Afshin MosahebiDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Toby RichardsDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal grafting for wound healing involves the transfer of the epidermis from a healthy location to cover a wound. The structural difference of the epidermal graft in comparison to the split-thickness skin graft and full-thickness skin graft contributes to the mechanism of effect. While skin grafting is an epidermal transfer, little is known about the precise mechanism of wound healing by epidermal graft. This paper aims to explore the evolution of the epidermal graft harvesting system over the last five decades, the structural advantages of epidermal graft for wound healing and the current hypotheses on the mechanism of wound healing by epidermal graft. Three mechanisms are proposed: keratinocyte activation, growth factor secretion and reepithelialisation from the wound edge. We evaluate and explain how these processes work and integrate to promote wound healing based on the current in vivo and in vitro evidence. We also review the ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of epidermal graft for wound healing. The epidermal graft is a promising alternative to the more invasive conventional surgical techniques as it is simple, less expensive and reduces the surgical burden for patients in need of wound coverage.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEpidermisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin TransplantationWound HealingWounds and InjuriesEpidermal graftHealing mechanismSkin graftUltrastructureWound healing

Identifiers

PMID27785878
PMCPMC7950150
OpenAlexW2544200170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.