Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785820›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Central nervous system toxicity of mefenamic acid overdose compared with other NSAIDs: an analysis of cases reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service.

Ashraf Kamour, Siobhan Crichton, Gill Cooper, David J Lupton, Michael Eddleston, J Allister Vale, John P Thompson, Simon H L Thomas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The problem of propranolol poisoning.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ashraf KamourNational Poisons Information Service, Newcastle Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wolfson Unit, Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Siobhan CrichtonDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, King's College London, Capital House, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
Gill CooperNational Poisons Information Service, Cardiff Unit, University Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan, CF64 2XX, UK.
David J LuptonNational Poisons Information Service, Edinburgh Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Michael EddlestonNational Poisons Information Service, Edinburgh Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
J Allister ValeNational Poisons Information Service, Birmingham Unit, City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
John P ThompsonNational Poisons Information Service, Cardiff Unit, University Hospital Llandough, Penlan Road, Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan, CF64 2XX, UK.
Simon H L ThomasNational Poisons Information Service, Newcastle Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wolfson Unit, Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Llandough · GBBirmingham City Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCase reports and small case series suggest increased central nervous system (CNS) toxicity, especially convulsions, after overdose of mefenamic acid, compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), although comparative epidemiological studies have not been conducted. The current study compared rates of CNS toxicity after overdose between mefenamic acid, ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen, as reported in telephone enquiries to the UK National Poisons Information Service (NPIS).

methodsNPIS telephone enquiries related to the four NSAIDs, received between January 2007 and December 2013, were analysed, comparing the frequency of reported CNS toxicity (convulsions, altered conscious level, agitation or aggression, confusion or disorientation) using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 22 937 patient-specific telephone enquiries, 10 398 did not involve co-ingestion of other substances (mefenamic acid 461, ibuprofen 8090, diclofenac 1300, naproxen 547). Patients taking mefenamic acid were younger and more commonly female than those using other NSAIDs. Those ingesting mefenamic acid were more likely to experience CNS toxicity than those ingesting the other NSAIDs combined [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.68, 10.62], especially convulsions (adjusted OR 81.5, 95% CI 27.8, 238.8). Predictors of CNS toxicity included reported dose and age, but not gender.

conclusionsMefenamic acid overdose is associated with a much larger and dose-related risk of CNS toxicity, especially convulsions, compared with overdose of other NSAIDs. The benefit-risk profile of mefenamic acid should now be re-evaluated in light of effective and less toxic alternatives.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChildChild, PreschoolDiclofenacDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansIbuprofenInfantInfant, NewbornAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacIbuprofenMefenamic AcidNaproxenCNS toxicityconvulsionsmefenamic acidnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugoverdosepoisoning

Identifiers

PMID27785820
PMCPMC5346865
OpenAlexW2545129918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.