Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785766›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2016

Impact of

Christina Bluemel, Fraenze Linke, Ken Herrmann, Iva Simunovic, Matthias Eiber, Christian Kestler, Andreas K Buck, Andreas Schirbel, Thorsten A Bley, Hans-Juergen Wester and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Clinical Utility ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina BluemelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. bluemel_c@ukw.de.
Fraenze LinkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Ansbach, Ansbach, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Iva SimunovicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Christian KestlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas K BuckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas SchirbelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Thorsten A BleyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Hans-Juergen WesterPharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Daniel VerghoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Axel BeckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Ansbach, Ansbach, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEEssen University Hospital · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalvage radiotherapy (SRT) is clinically established in prostate cancer (PC) patients with PSA persistence or biochemical relapse (BCR) after prior radical surgery. PET/CT imaging prior to SRT may be performed to localize disease recurrence. The recently introduced

resultsSuspicious lesions were detected in 24/45 (53.3 %) patients. In 62.5 % of patients, lesions were only detected by

conclusions

Indexed as

PET/CTProstate cancerPSMARecurrenceSalvage radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27785766
PMCPMC5081978
OpenAlexW2540348172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.