Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785752›Full record

ReviewThe Psychiatric quarterly2017

Training Psychiatry Residents in Psychotherapy: The Role of Manualized Treatments.

Joshua Pagano, Brandon N Kyle, Toni L Johnson, Sy Atezaz Saeed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua PaganoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Cherry Hospital, 201 Stevens Mill Rd, Goldsboro, NC, 27530, USA. Joshua.Pagano@dhhs.nc.gov.
Brandon N KyleDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Mail Stop 694, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Toni L JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic, 905 Johns Hopkins Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Sy Atezaz SaeedDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, 905 Johns Hopkins Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based treatment and manualized psychotherapy have a recent but rich history. As interest and research have progressed, defining the role of treatment manuals in resident training and clinical practice has become more important. Although there is not a universal definition of treatment manual, most clinicians and researchers agree that treatment manuals are an essential piece of evidence-based therapy, and that despite several limitations, they offer advantages in training residents in psychotherapy. Requirements for resident training in psychotherapy have changed over the years, and treatment manuals offer a simple and straightforward way to meet training requirements. In a search limited to only depression, two treatment manuals emerged with the support of research regarding both clinical practice and resident training. In looking toward the future, it will be important for clinicians to remain updated on further advances in evidence based manualized treatment as a tool for training residents in psychotherapy, including recent developments in online and smartphone based treatments.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyManuals as TopicPsychiatryPsychotherapyACGMEDepressionE-mental healthEvidence-based treatmentPsychotherapyTreatment manual

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.