Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785723›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Toxic effect of two kinds of mineral collectors on soil microbial richness and activity: analysis by microcalorimetry, microbial count, and enzyme activity assay.

Prudence Bararunyeretse, Jun Yao, Yunrong Dai, Samuel Bigawa, Zunwei Guo, Mijia Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. UVRoyal Society open science · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Prudence BararunyeretseSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering and National International Cooperation Base on Environmental and Energy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, 100083, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0259-1601
Jun YaoSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering and National International Cooperation Base on Environmental and Energy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, 100083, Beijing, People's Republic of China. yaojun@ustb.edu.cn.
Yunrong DaiSchool of water resource and Environment Engineering, Sino-Hungarian Joint laboratory of Environmental Science and Health, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China.
Samuel BigawaFaculty of Sciences, Biology Department, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Zunwei GuoSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering and National International Cooperation Base on Environmental and Energy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, 100083, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mijia ZhuSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering and National International Cooperation Base on Environmental and Energy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, 100083, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
University of Science and Technology Beijing · CNChina University of Geosciences (Beijing) · CNUniversité du Burundi · BI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flotation reagents are hugely and increasingly used in mining and other industrial and economic activities from which an important part is discharged into the environment. China could be the most affected country by the resulting pollution. However, their ecotoxicological dimension is still less addressed and understood. This study aimed to analyze the toxic effect of sodium isobutyl xanthate (SIBX) and sodium isopropyl xanthate (SIPX) to soil microbial richness and activity and to make a comparison between the two compounds in regard to their effects on soil microbial and enzymes activities. Different methods, including microcalorimetry, viable cell counts, cell density, and catalase and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrololase activities measurement, were applied. The two chemicals exhibited a significant inhibitory effect (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) to all parameters, SIPX being more adverse than SIBX. As the doses of SIBX and SIPX increased from 5 to 300 μg g

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyMiningSoil MicrobiologyBiodiversityCalorimetryCatalaseEnvironmental PollutantsThionesCatalaseEnvironmental Pollutantsisobutyl xanthatepropylxanthateThionesDecomposition productsEnzyme activityMicrocalorimetrySodium isobutyl xanthateSodium isopropyl xanthateToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27785723
OpenAlexW2541962759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.