Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785567›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2017

The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces.

Gennaro Ruggiero, Francesca Frassinetti, Yann Coello, Mariachiara Rapuano, Armando Schiano di Cola, Tina Iachini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Baby face enlarges perceived reachable space.Experimental brain research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Close encounters: Interpersonal proximity amplifies social appraisals.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gennaro RuggieroLaboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. gennaro.ruggiero@unina2.it.
Francesca FrassinettiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Yann CoelloCognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory, UMR CNRS 9193, University of Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Mariachiara RapuanoLaboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Armando Schiano di ColaLaboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Tina IachiniLaboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico, 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying individuals' intent through the emotional valence conveyed by their facial expression influences our capacity to approach-avoid these individuals during social interactions. Here, we explore if and how the emotional valence of others' facial expressiveness modulates peripersonal-action and interpersonal-social spaces. Through Immersive Virtual Reality, participants determined reachability-distance (for peripersonal space) and comfort-distance (for interpersonal space) from male/female virtual confederates exhibiting happy, angry and neutral facial expressions while being approached by (passive-approach) or walking toward (active-approach) them. Results showed an increase of distance when seeing angry rather than happy confederates in both approach conditions of comfort-distance. The effect also appeared in reachability-distance, but only in the passive-approach. Anger prompts avoidant behaviors, and thus an expansion of distance, particularly with a potential violation of near body space by an intruder. Overall, the findings suggest that peripersonal-action space, in comparison with interpersonal-social space, is similarly sensitive to the emotional valence of stimuli. We propose that this similarity could reflect a common adaptive mechanism shared by these spaces, presumably at different degrees, for ensuring self-protection functions.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionInterpersonal RelationsPersonal SpaceAdultAvoidance LearningFemaleHumansMaleSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.