ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2017
[Influence of the donor age on graft survival : Is the demographic change also important for corneal tissue donation?]
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cornea Procurement and Processing up to 72 Hours: No Risk for Cornea Transplant Quality.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of corneal transplantation highly depends on the quality of the used graft. Various factors play a crucial role such as a perfect stroma without optically relevant, centrally located cloudiness or changes (e. g. scars) or an adherent Descemet membrane. One of the most important parameters is the quality of the endothelial cell layer with a sufficiently large endothelial cell count. An open question is so far whether the donor age affects corneal quality and therefore has an impact on the success of transplantation. A comprehensive review of the available literature revealed that a large amount of scientific data on the influence of donor age exist to answer this question. In a variety of studies, no significant dependence of graft quality of donor age could be detected. Rather the studies prove that graft survival depends primarily on the state of the endothelial cell layer, and postoperative endothelial cell loss must be considered as a major cause of graft failure. Extensive quality assurance procedures in tissue preparation and cornea processing in the eye banks in Germany (Europe) ensures that only corneas with tested high quality are allocated for transplantation regardless of the donor age. Against the background of an aging population, the use of grafts from older donors should not be waived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.