Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785548›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Tactile short-term memory in sensory-deprived individuals.

Costanza Papagno, Giovanna Minniti, Giulia C Mattavelli, Lara Mantovan, Carlo Cecchetto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Navigating Cognitive Screening and Service Delivery for Sensory Impairment in Occupational Therapy.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exposure shapes the perception of affective touch.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Costanza PapagnoDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Milano, NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1- Edificio U6, 20126, Milano, Italy. costanza.papagno@unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-6294
Giovanna MinnitiDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Milano, NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1- Edificio U6, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Giulia C MattavelliDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Milano, NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1- Edificio U6, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Lara MantovanDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Milano, NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1- Edificio U6, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Carlo CecchettoDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Neuroscience Milano, NeuroMi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1- Edificio U6, 20126, Milano, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To verify whether loosing a sense or two has consequences on a spared sensory modality, namely touch, and whether these consequences depend on practice or are biologically determined, we investigated 13 deafblind participants, 16 deaf participants, 15 blind participants, and 13 matched normally sighted and hearing controls on a tactile short-term memory task, using checkerboard matrices of increasing length in which half of the squares were made up of a rough texture and half of a smooth one. Time of execution of a fixed matrix, number of correctly reproduced matrices, largest matrix correctly reproduced and tactile span were recorded. The three groups of sensory-deprived individuals did not differ in any measure, while blind and deaf participants outscored controls in all parameters except time of execution; the difference approached significance for deafblind people compared to controls only in one measure, namely correctly reproduced matrices. In blind and deafblind participants, performance negatively correlated with age of Braille acquisition, the older being the subject when acquiring Braille, the lower the performance, suggesting that practice plays a role. However, the fact that deaf participants, who did not share tactile experience, performed similarly to blind participants and significantly better than controls highlights that practice cannot be the only contribution to better tactile memory.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlindnessDeafnessFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedTime FactorsTouchYoung AdultBlindnessDeafblindDeafnessMultisensory-deprived individualsTactile memory

Identifiers

PMID27785548
OpenAlexW2543265053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.