Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785524›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2016

[Strategies for cerebrospinal fluid analysis - Integrated results report].

M Uhr, H Tumani, P Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M UhrMax-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804, München, Deutschland. uhr@psych.mpg.de.
H TumaniFachklinik für Neurologie Dietenbronn, Schwendi, Deutschland.
P LangeKlinik für Neurologie UMG, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DEMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis requires a combined assessment of all individual test findings in an integrated total report in order to achieve a reliable and specific diagnostic conclusion. Such a standard assessment strategy allows the identification of disease-typical result patterns and plausibility checks to avoid analytical errors. The integrated total report consists of 1) a basic CSF program with cytological and protein chemical parameters, 2) an expanded CSF program with special parameters for detection of pathogens and markers of neurodegeneration and 3) a final contextual interpretation considering methodological and clinical aspects.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalBiomarkersBlood ProteinsCerebrospinal FluidClinical Laboratory TechniquesHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersBlood ProteinsAlbuminsCerebrospinal fluid proteinsCytologyImmunoglobulinsSerum globulins

Identifiers

PMID27785524
OpenAlexW2544972108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.