Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785428›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2016

Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedure in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Zine-Eddine Khene, Romain Mathieu, Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet, Thomas Seisen, Morgan Roupret, Shahrokh F Shariat, Benoit Peyronnet, Karim Bensalah

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk stratification for upper tract urinary carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zine-Eddine KheneDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Romain MathieuDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Solène-Florence Kammerer-JacquetDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France;; Department of Pathology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Thomas SeisenAcademic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; ; GRC 5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, University Institute of Oncology, UMPC University Paris 6, Paris, France.
Morgan RoupretAcademic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; ; GRC 5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, University Institute of Oncology, UMPC University Paris 6, Paris, France.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; ; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; ; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
Benoit PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Karim BensalahDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCornell University · USPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedures (KSP) to treat upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a major issue. A non-systematic Medline/PubMed literature search was performed using the terms "upper tract urothelial carcinoma" with different combinations of keywords to review the current knowledge on this topic. Original articles, reviews and editorials in English language were selected based on their clinical relevance. Available techniques for KSP include segmental ureterectomy and endoscopic resection through a percutaneous or flexible ureteroscopic access. These approaches were traditionally restricted to patients with imperative indications. Current recommendations suggest that selected patients with normal contralateral kidney should also be candidates for such treatments. Modern imaging and endoscopy have improved to accurately stage and grade the tumor while various prognostic clinical factors and biomarkers have been proposed to identify tumor with aggressive features and worse outcomes. Several predictive models using different combinations of such baseline characteristics may help clinicians in clinical decision making. However, risk-adapted based approach that has been proposed in recent guidelines to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from KSP only relies on few clinical and pathological factors. Despite growing understanding of the disease, treatment of UTUC remains challenging. Further efforts and collaborative multicenter studies are mandatory to improve risk stratification to decide and promote optimal KSP in UTUC. These efforts should focus on the integration of promising biomarkers and predictive tools in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

kidney sparing procedures (KSP)Risk stratificationupper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)

Identifiers

PMID27785428
PMCPMC5071190
OpenAlexW2535825941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.