Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785348›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2016

How to study the impact of sex and gender in medical research: a review of resources.

Alyson J McGregor, Memoona Hasnain, Kathryn Sandberg, Mary F Morrison, Michelle Berlin, Justina Trott

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies - insights from home-cage monitoring.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Sex-Related Differences in Physiologically-Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of biological sex in inflammatory bowel diseases.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex as a biological variable for cardiovascular physiology.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Guidelines on the use of sex and gender in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alyson J McGregorDivision of Sex and Gender in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI USA.
Memoona HasnainDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Kathryn SandbergCenter for the Study of Sex Differences in Health, Aging and Disease, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary F MorrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA ; Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Michelle BerlinCenter for Women's Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA.
Justina TrottUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA.
Brown University · USGeorgetown University · USOregon Health & Science University · USTemple University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Immune Modulation of HypertensionR01HL119380 · NHLBI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing appreciation by the biomedical community that studying the impact of sex and gender on health, aging, and disease will lead to improvements in human health. Sex- and gender-based comparisons can inform research on disease mechanisms and the development of new therapeutics as well as enhance scientific rigor and reproducibility. This review will assist basic researchers, clinical investigators, as well as epidemiologists, population, and social scientists by providing an annotated bibliography of currently available resource tools on how to consider sex and gender as independent variables in research design and methodology. These resources will assist investigators applying for funding from the National Institutes of Health since all grant applicants will be required (as of January 25, 2016) to address the role of sex as a biological variable in vertebrate animal and human studies.

Indexed as

Gender analysisResearch methodsResourceSex analysisSex and gender

Identifiers

PMID27785348
PMCPMC5073798
OpenAlexW2531072432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.