Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785077›Full record

ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2016

Prognostic value of endocan expression in cancers: evidence from meta-analysis.

Xing Huang, Chen Chen, Xin Wang, Jing-Yuan Zhang, Bin-Hui Ren, Da-Wei Ma, Lei Xia, Xin-Yu Xu, Lin Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Endocan in Kidney Diseases.International journal of nephrology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xing HuangDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Chen ChenSecond Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University.
Xin WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Jing-Yuan ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Bin-Hui RenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Da-Wei MaDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Lei XiaDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Xin-Yu XuDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital.
Lin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Cancer Research, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocan is a 50 kDa dermatan sulfate proteoglycan. Numerous previous studies have indicated that endocan might be an attractive prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of different studies are inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between endocan expression and cancer prognosis. A systematic, comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was performed. Expression of endocan and its association with overall survival were evaluated by pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 15 eligible studies of 1,464 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. A significant association was found between elevated endocan expression and poorer overall survival (pooled HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 2.12-2.90,

Indexed as

biomarkercancerendocanESM-1meta-analysisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27785077
PMCPMC5066987
OpenAlexW2531897251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.