ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016
Influence of
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glutathione S-transferase pi 1 variant and squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 52 case-control studies.BMC medical genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Association between MDM2 rs2279744, MDM2 rs937283, and p21 rs1801270 polymorphisms and retinoblastoma susceptibility.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- The 40bp Indel Polymorphism rs150550023 in theCancers · 2020Article
- Genetic Susceptibility in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Spanish Population.Cancers · 2019Article
- The MDM2 rs937283 A > G variant significantly increases the risk of lung and gastric cancer in Chinese population.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Analysis of the role of rs2031920 and rs3813867 polymorphisms within theCancer cell international · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeControversial associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2279744, rs937283, rs3730485) of the MATERIALS AND
methodsWe systematically reviewed the available data and conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the genetic effect of
resultsAfter screening, 7,987 SCC cases and 12,954 controls from 26 eligible case-control studies were enrolled. Overall, compared with the control group, a significantly increased SCC risk was observed for the
conclusionOur results highlight a positive association between the GG genotype of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.