Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785010›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

Efficacy and safety of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in Japanese patients with COPD: a subgroup analysis from the SHINE study.

Shu Hashimoto, Hisataro Ikeuchi, Shujiro Murata, Tetsuji Kitawaki, Kimitoshi Ikeda, Donald Banerji

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Narrative review of current COPD status in Japan.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shu HashimotoDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisataro IkeuchiNovartis Pharma KK, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shujiro MurataNovartis Pharma KK, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuji KitawakiNovartis Pharma KK, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimitoshi IkedaNovartis Pharma KK, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Donald BanerjiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOPD-related deaths are increasing in Japan, with ~5.3 million people at risk.

methodsThe SHINE was a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study that evaluated safety and efficacy of indacaterol (IND)/glycopyrronium (GLY) 110/50 μg once daily (od) compared with GLY 50 μg od, IND 150 μg od, open-label tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg od, and placebo. The primary end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV

resultsOf 2,144 patients from the SHINE study, 182 (8.5%) were Japanese and randomized to IND/GLY (n=42), IND (n=41), GLY (n=40), TIO (n=40), or placebo (n=19). Improvement in trough FEV

conclusionIND/GLY demonstrated superior efficacy and comparable safety compared with its monocomponents, open-label TIO, and placebo and may be used as a treatment option for the management of moderate-to-severe COPD in Japanese patients.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedArea Under CurveBronchodilator AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeGlycopyrrolateHumansIndansJapanLungMaleMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDrug CombinationsGlycopyrrolateindacaterolIndansMuscarinic AntagonistsQuinolonesCOPDindacaterol/glycopyrroniumJapanese subgroupopen-label tiotropiumSHINE study

Identifiers

PMID27785010
PMCPMC5066848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.