Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27785007›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

Influence of inhaler technique on asthma and COPD control: a multicenter experience.

Aleksandra Dudvarski Ilic, Vladimir Zugic, Biljana Zvezdin, Ivan Kopitovic, Ivan Cekerevac, Vojislav Cupurdija, Nela Perhoc, Vesna Veljkovic, Aleksandra Barac

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reliability and validity test and application of the Chinese version of the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra Dudvarski IlicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; Clinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade.
Vladimir ZugicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; Clinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade.
Biljana ZvezdinFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad; Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica.
Ivan KopitovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad; Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica.
Ivan CekerevacFaculty of Medicine, University of Kragujevac; Clinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Kragujevac.
Vojislav CupurdijaFaculty of Medicine, University of Kragujevac; Clinic for Pulmonology, Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Kragujevac.
Nela PerhocClinic for Pulmonary Diseases Knez Selo, Clinical Centre Nis, Nis.
Vesna VeljkovicClinic for Pulmonary Diseases Knez Selo, Clinical Centre Nis, Nis.
Aleksandra BaracFaculty of Stomatology, University Academy of Business Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Klinički centar Niš · RSClinical Centre of Kragujevac · RSInstitute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina · RSUniversity Clinical Centre · PLUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Kragujevac · RSUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe successful management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mostly depends on adherence to inhalation drug therapy, the usage of which is commonly associated with many difficulties in real life. Improvement of patients' adherence to inhalation technique could lead to a better outcome in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the utility of inhalation technique in clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD during a 3-month follow-up.

methodsA total of 312 patients with asthma or COPD who used dry powder Turbuhaler were enrolled in this observational study. During three visits (once a month), training in seven-step inhalation technique was given and it was practically demonstrated. Correctness of patients' usage of inhaler was assessed in three visits by scoring each of the seven steps during administration of inhaler dose. Assessment of disease control was done at each visit and evaluated as: fully controlled, partially controlled, or uncontrolled. Patients' subjective perception of the simplicity of inhalation technique, disease control, and quality of life were assessed by using specially designed questionnaires.

resultsSignificant improvement in inhalation technique was achieved after the third visit compared to the first one, as measured by the seven-step inhaler usage score (5.94 and 6.82, respectively;

conclusionAdherence to inhalation therapy is one of the key factors of successful respiratory disease treatment. Therefore, health care professionals should insist on educational programs aimed at improving patients' inhalation technique with different devices, resulting in better long-term disease control and improved quality of life.

Indexed as

Dry Powder InhalersPatient ComplianceAdministration, InhalationAdultAgedAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicBronchodilator AgentsadherenceasthmaCOPDinhalation techniqueTurbuhaler

Identifiers

PMID27785007
PMCPMC5063589
OpenAlexW2529515074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.