Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27784584›Full record

ReviewSexual medicine reviews2013

Animal Models for the Study of Female Sexual Dysfunction.

Lesley Marson, Maria Adele Giamberardino, Raffaele Costantini, Peter Czakanski, Ursula Wesselmann

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual medicine reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Vulvodynia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  6. Co-occurrence of pain syndromes.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lesley MarsonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: lesley_marson@med.unc.edu.
Maria Adele Giamberardino"G. D'Annunzio" University-Pathophysiology of Pain Laboratory, Chieti, Italy.
Raffaele Costantini"G. D'Annunzio" University-Institute of Surgical Pathology, Chieti, Italy.
Peter CzakanskiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham-Departments of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ursula WesselmannUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham-Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mechanisms of VulvodyniaR01HD039699 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WESSELMANN, URSULA · 2001 to 2005
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSignificant progress has been made in elucidating the physiological and pharmacological mechanisms of female sexual function through preclinical animal research. The continued development of animal models is vital for the understanding and treatment of the many diverse disorders that occur in women.

aimTo provide an updated review of the experimental models evaluating female sexual function that may be useful for clinical translation.

methodsReview of English written, peer-reviewed literature, primarily from 2000 to 2012, that described studies on female sexual behavior related to motivation, arousal, physiological monitoring of genital function and urogenital pain. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Analysis of supporting evidence for the suitability of the animal model to provide measurable indices related to desire, arousal, reward, orgasm, and pelvic pain.

resultsThe development of female animal models has provided important insights in the peripheral and central processes regulating sexual function. Behavioral models of sexual desire, motivation, and reward are well developed. Central arousal and orgasmic responses are less well understood, compared with the physiological changes associated with genital arousal. Models of nociception are useful for replicating symptoms and identifying the neurobiological pathways involved. While in some cases translation to women correlates with the findings in animals, the requirement of circulating hormones for sexual receptivity in rodents and the multifactorial nature of women's sexual function requires better designed studies and careful analysis. The current models have studied sexual dysfunction or pelvic pain in isolation; combining these aspects would help to elucidate interactions of the pathophysiology of pain and sexual dysfunction.

conclusionsBasic research in animals has been vital for understanding the anatomy, neurobiology, and physiological mechanisms underlying sexual function and urogenital pain. These models are important for understanding the etiology of female sexual function and for future development of pharmacological treatments for sexual dysfunctions with or without pain. Marson L, Giamberardino MA, Costantini R, Czakanski P, and Wesselmann U. Animal models for the study of female sexual dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2013;1:108-122.

Indexed as

ArousalCopulatory BehaviorDesireNeural PathwaysOrgasmPain

Identifiers

PMID27784584
PMCPMC5568851
OpenAlexW1511194512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.