Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27784530›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2016

Prolonged colonisation with Escherichia coli O25:ST131 versus other extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli in a long-term care facility with high endemic level of rectal colonisation, the Netherlands, 2013 to 2014.

Ilse Overdevest, Manon Haverkate, Jacobien Veenemans, Yvonne Hendriks, Carlo Verhulst, Ans Mulders, Willemijn Couprie, Martin Bootsma, James Johnson, Jan Kluytmans

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Duration and predictors of colonization with MDRInfection prevention in practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Phase-Dependent MoSInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissemination of High-Risk ClonesMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Conserved FimH mutations in the globalComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilse OverdevestLaboratory for Medical Microbiology, Stichting PAMM, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Manon Haverkate
Jacobien Veenemans
Yvonne Hendriks
Carlo Verhulst
Ans Mulders
Willemijn Couprie
Martin Bootsma
James Johnson
Jan Kluytmans
Amphia Ziekenhuis · NLThebe · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Gut reservoir of E. coli ST131I01CX000920 · VA · MINNEAPOLIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHNSON, JAMES R · 2014 to 2021
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli clone ST131 (ESBL-ST131) has spread in healthcare settings worldwide. The reasons for its successful spread are unknown, but might include more effective transmission and/or longer persistence. We evaluated the colonisation dynamics of ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC), including ESBL-ST131, in a long-term care facility (LTCF) with an unusually high prevalence of rectal ESBL-EC colonisation. During a 14-month period, rectal or faecal samples were obtained from 296 residents during six repetitive prevalence surveys, using ESBL-selective culture. Transmission rates, reproduction numbers, and durations of colonisation were compared for ESBL-ST131 vs other ESBL-EC. Furthermore, the likely time required for ESBL-ST131 to disappear from the LTCF was estimated. Over time, the endemic level of ESBL-ST131 remained elevated whereas other ESBL-EC returned to low-level prevalence, despite comparable transmission rates. Survival analysis showed a half-life of 13 months for ESBL-ST131 carriage, vs two to three months for other ESBL-EC (p < 0.001). Per-admission reproduction numbers were 0.66 for ESBL-ST131 vs 0.56 for other ESBL-EC, predicting a mean time of three to four years for ESBL-ST131 to disappear from the LTCF under current conditions. Transmission rates were comparable for ESBL-ST131 vs other ESBL-EC. Prolonged rectal carriage explained the persistence of ESBL-ST131 in the LTCF.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareNursing Homesbeta-LactamasesCarrier StateEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleGenotypeHumansLength of StayMolecular EpidemiologyNetherlandsPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceProspective Studiesbeta-LactamasescolonizationepidemiologyESBLEscherichia coliLong-term care facilityoutbreakST131 E. colitransmission

Identifiers

PMID27784530
PMCPMC5291152
OpenAlexW2545449101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.