Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27784301›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

The involvement of young people in school- and community-based noncommunicable disease prevention interventions: a scoping review of designs and outcomes.

Didier Jourdan, Julie Hellesøe Christensen, Emily Darlington, Ane Høstgaard Bonde, Paul Bloch, Bjarne Bruun Jensen, Peter Bentsen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. [School health promotion in pandemic times. Results of the COVID-HL school principal study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Health Promoting Schools: An Update.Applied health economics and health policy · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Breast Cancer in San Francisco: Disentangling Disparities at the Neighborhood Level.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Didier JourdanHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark.
Julie Hellesøe ChristensenHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark. jlhc@steno.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5825-9435
Emily DarlingtonLaboratoire Acté EA 4281, ESPE Clermont-Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, 36, avenue Jean Jaurès C.S. 20001, Chamalières Cedex, 63407, France.
Ane Høstgaard BondeHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark.
Paul BlochHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark.
Bjarne Bruun JensenHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark.
Peter BentsenHealth Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 6, Gentofte, 2820, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince stakeholders' active engagement is essential for public health strategies to be effective, this review is focused on intervention designs and outcomes of school- and community-based noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention interventions involving children and young people.

methodsThe review process was based on the principles of scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in eight major databases in October 2015. Empirical studies published in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish were considered. Five selection criteria were applied. Included in the review were (1) empirical studies describing (2) a health intervention focused on diet and/or physical activity, (3) based on children's and young people's involvement that included (4) a relationship between school and local community while (5) providing explicit information about the outcomes of the intervention. The search provided 3995 hits, of which 3253 were screened by title and abstract, leading to the full-text screening of 24 papers. Ultimately, 12 papers were included in the review. The included papers were analysed independently by at least two reviewers.

resultsFew relevant papers were identified because interventions are often either based on children's involvement or are multi-setting, but rarely both. Children were involved through participation in needs assessments, health committees and advocacy. School-community collaboration ranged from shared activities, to joint interventions with common goals and activities. Most often, collaboration was school-initiated. Most papers provided a limited description of the outcomes. Positive effects were identified at the organisational level (policy, action plans, and healthy environments), in adult stakeholders (empowerment, healthy eating) and in children (knowledge, social norms, critical thinking, and health behaviour). Limitations related to the search and analytical methods are discussed.

conclusionThere are very few published studies on the effectiveness of interventions based on children's involvement in school- and community-based NCD prevention programmes. However, interventions with these characteristics show potential benefits, and the merits of complex multi-setting approaches should be further explored through intervention-based studies assessing their effectiveness and identifying which components contribute to the observed outcomes.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationSchool Health ServicesAdolescentChildCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSchoolsCommunityEffect studyHealthNCDParticipationPreventionPupilSchoolScoping studyStudent

Identifiers

PMID27784301
PMCPMC5080716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.