Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27783644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Attitudes toward Bisexual Men and Women among a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Adults in the United States.

Brian Dodge, Debby Herbenick, M Reuel Friedman, Vanessa Schick, Tsung-Chieh Jane Fu, Wendy Bostwick, Elizabeth Bartelt, Miguel Muñoz-Laboy, David Pletta, Michael Reece and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
30.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brian DodgeCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-6603
Debby HerbenickCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
M Reuel FriedmanGraduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Vanessa SchickUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Tsung-Chieh Jane FuCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Wendy BostwickDepartment of Health Systems Science, School of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Elizabeth BarteltCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Miguel Muñoz-LaboySchool of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia. Pennsylvania, United States of America.
David PlettaCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Michael ReeceCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Theo G M SandfortDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Indiana University Bloomington · USColumbia University · USTemple University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MILTON L WAINBERG · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As bisexual individuals in the United States (U.S.) face significant health disparities, researchers have posited that these differences may be fueled, at least in part, by negative attitudes, prejudice, stigma, and discrimination toward bisexual individuals from heterosexual and gay/lesbian individuals. Previous studies of individual and social attitudes toward bisexual men and women have been conducted almost exclusively with convenience samples, with limited generalizability to the broader U.S. POPULATION: Our study provides an assessment of attitudes toward bisexual men and women among a nationally representative probability sample of heterosexual, gay, lesbian, and other-identified adults in the U.S. Data were collected from the 2015 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (NSSHB), via an online questionnaire with a probability sample of adults (18 years and over) from throughout the U.S. We included two modified 5-item versions of the Bisexualities: Indiana Attitudes Scale (BIAS), validated sub-scales that were developed to measure attitudes toward bisexual men and women. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, gamma regression, and paired t-tests. Gender, sexual identity, age, race/ethnicity, income, and educational attainment were all significantly associated with participants' attitudes toward bisexual individuals. In terms of responses to individual scale items, participants were most likely to "neither agree nor disagree" with all attitudinal statements. Across sexual identities, self-identified other participants reported the most positive attitudes, while heterosexual male participants reported the least positive attitudes. As in previous research on convenience samples, we found a wide range of demographic characteristics were related with attitudes toward bisexual individuals in our nationally-representative study of heterosexual, gay/lesbian, and other-identified adults in the U.S. In particular, gender emerged as a significant characteristic; female participants' attitudes were more positive than male participants' attitudes, and all participants' attitudes were generally more positive toward bisexual women than bisexual men. While recent population data suggest a marked shift in more positive attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in the general population of the U.S., the largest proportions of participants in our study reported a relative lack of agreement or disagreement with all affective-evaluative statements in the BIAS scales. Findings document the relative lack of positive attitudes toward bisexual individuals among the general population of adults in the U.S. and highlight the need for developing intervention approaches to promote more positive attitudes toward bisexual individuals, targeted toward not only heterosexual but also gay/lesbian individuals and communities.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdolescentAdultBisexualityFemaleHeterosexualityHomosexuality, FemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproductive HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27783644
PMCPMC5082634
OpenAlexW2543721039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.