ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2016
The New Frontier of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography: Fractional Flow Reserve and Stress Myocardial Perfusion.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Additional diagnostic value of new CT imaging techniques for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessment by Coronary CT Angiography in Asymptomatic Diabetic Population: A Critical Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspectives.BioMed research international · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on coronary microcirculation: a mini-review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Pediatric three-dimensional quantitative cardiovascular computed tomography.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- State of the art of CT myocardial perfusion.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Reproducibility of a single-volume dynamic CT myocardial blood flow measurement technique: validation in a swine model.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Review
- Multimodality Imaging in Ischemic Chronic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Changing Paradigms in the Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease by Multimodality Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- The Incremental Role of Coronary Computed Tomography in Chronic Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: From Anatomy to Prognosis.BioMed research international · 2020Review
- CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Frontier in Cardiac Imaging.BioMed research international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe increased number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in developed countries is of great clinical relevance and involves a large burden of the healthcare system. The management of these patients is focused on relieving symptoms and improving clinical outcomes. Therefore the ideal test would provide the correct diagnosis and actionable information. To this aim, several non-invasive functional imaging modalities are usually used as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), but their diagnostic yield remains low with limited accuracy when compared to obstructive CAD at the time of ICA or invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). Invasive FFR is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of functionally relevant CAD. Therefore, an urgent need for non-invasive techniques that evaluate both the functional and morphological severity of CAD is growing. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a unique non-invasive technique providing coronary artery anatomic imaging. More recently, the evaluation of FFR with CCTA (FFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
27783337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.