Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27783275›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2017

A new peritoneal dialysis fluid for Japanese patients: a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial of safety and efficacy.

Masaaki Nakayama, Yoshindo Kawaguchi, Takashi Akiba, Masao Kim, Hidemune Naito, Shigeko Hara, Teruhiko Maeba, Noriaki Yorioka, James A Sloand, Mark R Marshall

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Text mining for case report articles on "peritoneal dialysis" from PubMed database.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Masaaki NakayamaDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Yoshindo KawaguchiHospital Affiliating with Kanagawa Prefecture Nursing School, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi AkibaSekikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masao KimKaikou Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Hidemune NaitoNaito Medical Research Laboratory, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Shigeko HaraHara Press Center Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruhiko MaebaAsao Kidney Clinic, Kawaski, Kanagawa, Japan.
Noriaki YoriokaHiroshima Kidney Organization, Hiroshima, Japan.
James A SloandTherapeutic Area, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Mark R MarshallTherapeutic Area, Baxter Healthcare (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore. mark_roger_marshall@baxter.com.
Baxter (United States) · USHiroshima University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital · JPKobe Kaisei Hospital · JPNishikawa Hospital · JPOsaka Kaisei Hospital · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPToranomon Hospital · JPUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report here two new peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) for Japan [BLR 250, BLR 350 (Baxter Limited, Japan)]. The PDFs use two-chamber systems, and have bicarbonate and lactate buffer to a total of 35 mmol/L. In separate trials, the new PDFs were compared to two "standard" systems [PD-4, PD-2 (Baxter Limited, Japan)]. The trials aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of peritoneal creatinine clearance (pCcr), peritoneal urea clearance (pCurea) and ultrafiltration volume (UF), and compare acid-base and electrolyte balance.

methodsWe performed randomized, multicenter, parallel group, controlled, open-label clinical trials in stable continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. The primary endpoints were pCcr and UF. The secondary endpoints were serum bicarbonate and peritoneal urea clearance. The active phase was 8 weeks. These trials were performed as non-inferiority studies, with the lower limit of non-inferiority for pCcr and UF set at 3.2 L/week/1.73 m

results108 patients (28 centers) and 103 patients (29 centers) took part in the two trials. Groups were well balanced at baseline. The investigative PDFs were non-inferior to the "standard" ones in terms of primary endpoints, comparable in terms of pCurea, and superior in terms acid-base balance, especially correcting those with over-alkalinization at baseline.

conclusionsWe demonstrated fundamental functionality of two new PDFs and showed superior acid-base balance. Given the propensity of Japanese CAPD patients for alkalosis, it is important to avoid metabolic alkalosis which is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality risk and accelerated vascular calcification. The new PDFs are important progress of CAPD treatment for Japanese patients.

Indexed as

Acid-Base EquilibriumAdultAgedAlkalosisBicarbonatesBuffersCreatinineDialysis SolutionsFemaleHumansJapanLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryPeritoneumBicarbonatesBuffersCreatinineDialysis SolutionsLactic AcidBiocompatibilityDialysis adequacyMetabolic alkalosisPeritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID27783275
PMCPMC5648742
OpenAlexW2533797003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.