Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27783206›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017

Procalcitonin is a useful biomarker to predict severe acute cholangitis: a single-center prospective study.

Gyotane Umefune, Hirofumi Kogure, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Hiroyuki Isayama, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Kaoru Takagi, Dai Akiyama, Takeo Watanabe, Naminatsu Takahara, Suguru Mizuno and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emergent Treatment of Acute Cholangitis and Acute Cholecystitis.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gyotane UmefuneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hirofumi KogureDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Tsuyoshi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. isayama-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Kazunaga IshigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Kaoru TakagiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Dai AkiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Takeo WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Naminatsu TakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Suguru MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Saburo MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Natsuyo YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Minoru TadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcalcitonin is being increasingly used to diagnose and grade acute systemic bacterial infection at an early stage of disease onset. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of procalcitonin for severity grading of acute cholangitis on patient admission.

methodsPatients with acute cholangitis were prospectively enrolled. The severity of acute cholangitis was graded on the basis of the 2013 Tokyo guidelines (Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2013). We compared the ability of procalcitonin level on admission to predict moderate/severe (vs mild) or severe (vs mild/moderate) acute cholangitis with the abilities of white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP) level.

resultsTwo hundred thirteen patients were analyzed, and the severity of acute cholangitis was graded as mild, moderate, and severe in 108, 76, and 29 patients respectively. Procalcitonin level, WBC count, and CRP level all increased significantly according to the severity. In the receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve for procalcitonin for severe acute cholangitis was 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-0.96] and was significantly greater than that for WBC (0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.76) and that for CRP (0.70; 95% CI 0.60-0.80). The optimal cutoff value for procalcitonin for prediction of severe acute cholangitis was 2.2 ng/mL (sensitivity 0.97; specificity 0.73; accuracy 0.77). The areas under the curve for procalcitonin, WBC, and CRP for moderate/severe acute cholangitis were not significantly different.

conclusionsProcalcitonin predicted severe acute cholangitis better than conventional biomarkers. Severe cases for which urgent biliary drainage is indicated might be identified on admission on the basis of the cutoff values for procalcitonin suggested in this study.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCalcitoninCholangitisC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinCholangitisCholedocholithiasisEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID27783206
OpenAlexW2537526809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.