ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2017
Identification of intra-hepatic communicating veins through the arch sign on CT-scan.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double Mini Upper Transversal Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases Infiltrating the Right and the Left Hepatic Veins at the Hepatocaval Confluence.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A Case of Right Hepatic Vein Thrombus with Spontaneous Peripheral Shunt Successfully Treated via Left Trisectionectomy with Bile Duct Resection.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Complex Hepatectomy Under Total Vascular Exclusion of the Liver Preserving the Caval Flow with Portal Hypothermic Perfusion and Temporary Portacaval Shunt: A Proof of Concept.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Historical anatomy of hepatic segmentation: about 250 livers corrosions by Rapp (1953) and Couinaud (1953) in the Conservatory of Anatomy in Montpellier.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020Review
- Right intersectional transection plane based on portal inflow in left trisectionectomy.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeKnowledge of vascular outflow is essential in liver surgery. Communicating veins between the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the middle hepatic vein (MHV) have been described and allowed us to perform new surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to predict the existence of intra-hepatic venous anastomosis by identifying communicating veins on 2D CT-scan imaging.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed data from 32 patients operated on for liver tumours between 2004 and 2013 who underwent a bisegmentectomy VI-VII enlarged to the RHV and/or a bisegmentectomy VII-VIII and/or a left hepatectomy enlarged to the MHV and who had pre and post-operative CT-scans. Patients with cirrhosis were excluded. We first analysed post-operative images and, in patients with a proven collateral vein, looked for evidence of this on pre-operative imaging. We then validated this pre-operative sign against post-operative imaging.
resultsCollaterals from both the RHV and the MHV formed an arch visible on pre-operative imaging which predicted the development of intrahepatic venous anastomosis in 20 patients. In 14 patients, a perfect match between the arch sign and development of collaterals was observed (n = 28). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 87, 80, 80, and 87%, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratio tests were 4.3 and 0.16, respectively.
conclusionCommunicating veins between the RHV and the MHV are frequent and can be predicted by the arch sign on 2D CT-scan. Hence the arch sign can be very useful when planning liver surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.