Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27783196›Full record

ArticlePituitary2017

Management of prolactinomas: a survey of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa.

Salem A Beshyah, Ibrahim H Sherif, Farida Chentli, Amir Hamrahian, Aly B Khalil, Hussein Raef, Mohamed El-Fikki, Selim Jambart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Controversies in Breastfeeding.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Salem A BeshyahCenter for Diabetes and Endocrinology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. beshyah@yahoo.com.
Ibrahim H SherifAl Afia Clinic, Tripoli, Libya.
Farida ChentliBab El Oued Hospital, Algiers, Algeria.
Amir HamrahianCleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Aly B KhalilImperial College London Diabetes Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Hussein RaefKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed El-FikkiUniversity of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.
Selim JambartSaint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Alexandria University · EGCentre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bab El Oued · DZImperial College London Diabetes Centre · AEKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SASaint Joseph University · LBShaikh Khalifa Medical City · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlactinomas are the commonest functional tumors of the pituitary gland. There are still controversies regarding medical therapy in specific clinical situations. Patients may be managed by different specialists in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and no data exist on patterns of clinical management.

objectivesTo ascertain the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prolactinomas among relevant professionals from the MENA region.

methodsAn online survey of a large sample of physicians was conducted. The questionnaire covered various aspects of diagnosis and treatment of prolactinomas. 468 respondents were included; 36 % were endocrinologists; 49 % worked in public facilities and 81 % graduated more than 10 years. 40 and 30 % would have seen 1-5 and more than 5 suspected or confirmed prolactinomas over a 6 months period, respectively.

resultsRegarding the diagnosis, 30 % of the respondents considered that prolactin levels <100 ng/ml exclude the presence of a prolactinoma. 21 % of respondents considered prolactin levels >250 ng/ml compatible with macroprolactinomas only, whereas others accepted this to be compatible also with microprolactinomas, macroprolactinaemia and drug-induced hyperprolactinemia (50, 42 and 36 % respectively). 71 % of respondents favored the screening for macroprolactin in asymptomatic individuals with hyperprolactinemia. Regarding the treatment, 84 % of respondents would treat microprolactinomas even in the absence of symptoms whereas 72 % of the respondents would treat microprolactinomas only if symptoms exist. 60 and 49 % of the respondents chose cabergoline as the drug of choice to treat macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas respectively. Similar proportions had no preference of either cabergoline or bromocriptine as the best treatment for macroprolactinoma (27 %) and microprolactinomas (32 %). 46 and 75 % of respondents favored treatment withdrawal 2-3 years after prolactin normalization in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively whereas 10 % of respondents withdraw treatment after menopause in either case. 94 % of respondents considered medical therapy as the primary treatment for microprolactinomas. In case of pregnancy, 49 % considered bromocriptine as the drug of choice for women who wish to become pregnant. 65 and 38 % of respondents advocated discontinuation of treatment with dopamine agonists in patients with microprolactinomas and macroprolactinomas, respectively. Finally, 48 % would allow breast-feeding without restriction, 28 % would restrict it to patients with microprolactinomas and 25 % would not recommend it for women with prolactinomas.

conclusionsThis is the first study of the clinical management of prolactinomas in the MENA region. Some of the practices are not in line with the latest Endocrine and Pituitary Societies guidelines. These warrant further discussions of contemporary guidelines in regional forums.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica, NorthernCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesFemaleHumansMiddle EastPhysiciansPituitary NeoplasmsPregnancyProlactinProlactinomaSurveys and QuestionnairesCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesProlactinHyperprolactinemiaMENA regionPituitary tumorsProlactin

Identifiers

PMID27783196
OpenAlexW2536928808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.