ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2017
Pilot study of enhanced social support with automated telephone monitoring after psychiatric hospitalization for depression.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Technology-Based Interventions Targeting Chronically Ill Adults and Their Caregivers.Western journal of nursing research · 2020Pooled it
- Digital interventions for subjective and objective social isolation among individuals with mental health conditions: a scoping review.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Peer-based interventions targeting suicide prevention: A scoping review.American journal of community psychology · 2021Article
- An Adaptive, Contextual, Technology-Aided Support (ACTS) System for Chronic Illness Self-Management.The Milbank quarterly · 2019Article
- Technological Interventions for Medication Adherence in Adult Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing discharge, patients hospitalized for depression are at high risk for poor retention in outpatient care and adverse outcomes.
aimsPilot tests a post-hospital monitoring and enhanced support program for depression.
method48 patients at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center discharged following a depression-related inpatient stay received weekly visits or phone calls for 6 months from their choice of either a family member/friend (n = 19) or a certified peer support specialist (n = 29). Participants also completed weekly automated telephone monitoring calls assessing depressive symptoms and antidepressant medication adherence.
resultsOver 90% of participants were more satisfied with their care due to the service. The mean change from baseline to 6 months in depression symptoms was -7.9 (p < 0.05) according to the Patient Health Questionnaire and -11.2 (p < 0.05) according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II for those supported by a family member/friend, whereas those supported by a peer specialist had mean changes of -3.5 (p < 0.05) and -1.7 (p > 0.10), respectively.
conclusionsIncreased contact with a chosen support person coupled with automated telephone monitoring after psychiatric hospitalization is an acceptable service for patients with depression. Those who received the service, and particularly those supported by a family member/friend, experienced reductions in symptoms of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27783130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.