ArticleClinical neuroradiology2018
Endovascular Treatment for Near Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery : 30-Day Outcome and Long-Term Follow-Up.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The pitfalls and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carotid near-occlusion: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Cartoid Near Occlusion: Time to Re-think Endarectomy?Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Carotid Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Carotid Near-Occlusion With Recurrent Symptoms.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Anatomical Considerations for Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Management of internal carotid artery near-occlusion: the need for updated evidence.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Carotid Near-Occlusion Stent Experiences.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2020Article
- Relevance of Distal Arterial Collapse in Stenting of Atherosclerotic Near-Occlusion of the Carotid Artery.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Successful Endovascular Treatment of a Giant Hepatic Artery Aneurysm with Dual Layer Stents Placement as Flow-Diverting Option: Case Report.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment strategy and the correct incidence of near occlusion (NO) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is still controversial. In routine radiological imaging NO can easily be misdiagnosed as complete occlusion and there is no consensus on the standard treatment strategy. PURPOSE: To present our perioperative and long-term follow-up results of ICA NO patients treated with carotid artery stenting (CAS). MATERIAL AND
methodsBetween 2004-2014 a total of 182 patients with ICA NO were evaluated for CAS. The study included 132 male (72.5 %) and 50 female (27.5 %) patients with a mean age of 70.2 years. Patients underwent a clinical neurological evaluation and radiological imaging of the carotid arteries before the CAS procedure. Of the patients 80 (44 %) were asymptomatic. The median clinical and carotid Doppler ultrasound (DUS) follow-up period was 64 months (range 18-124 months).
resultsIn 182 patients CAS were performed, 4 patients (2.2 %) developed minor stroke, 2 patients (1.1 %) developed myocardial infarction but no major stroke or death occurred in the following 30-day period. Asymptomatic restenosis was detected in seven patients (3.8 %) in the follow-up period.
conclusionWith sufficient neurological evaluation during pretreatment and posttreatment periods and when the procedure is performed with technologically developed products by an experienced interventional team, CAS is beneficial in patients with ICA NO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.