Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782838›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Parental involvement and association with adolescents' fruit and vegetable intake at follow-up: Process evaluation results from the multi-component school-based Boost intervention.

Sanne Ellegård Jørgensen, Thea Suldrup Jørgensen, Anne Kristine Aarestrup, Pernille Due, Rikke Krølner

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne Ellegård JørgensenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2., 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark. saej@niph.dk.
Thea Suldrup JørgensenCouncil on Health and Disease Prevention, Kristianiagade 12, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Anne Kristine AarestrupIntersectoral Research Unit for Health Services, The Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, 23 Bispebjerg Bakke, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Pernille DueNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2., 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Rikke KrølnerNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2., 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on the assumption of parental influence on adolescent behavior, multicomponent school-based dietary interventions often include a parental component. The effect of this intervention component is seldom reported and the evidence is inconsistent. We conducted a systematic process evaluation of the parental component and examined whether the leveal of parental involvement in a large multi-component intervention: the Boost study was associated with adolescents' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake at follow-up.

methodsThe Boost study was targeting FV intake among 1,175 Danish 7 STUDY POPULATION: Students whose parent replied to the follow-up survey (n = 347). DATA: Questionnaire data from students, parents and teachers at 20 intervention schools. Process evaluation measures: dose delivered, dose received, appreciation and level of parental involvement. Parental involvement was trichotomized into: low/no (0-2 points), medium (3 points) and high (4-6 points). The association between level of parental involvement and self-reported FV intake (24-h recall), was analyzed using multilevel regression analyses.

resultsThe Boost study was presented at a parent-school meeting at all intervention schools. The dose delivered was low to moderate for the three other parental elements. Most parents appreciated the intervention and talked with their child about Boost (83.5 %). High, medium and low parental involvement was found among 30.5 %, 29.6 % and 39.4 % of the students respectively. Parental involvement was highest among women. More men agreed that the parental newsletters provided new information. Students with a medium and high level of parental involvement ate 47.5 and 95.2 g more FV per day compared to students with low level/no parental involvement (p = 0.02).

conclusionsStudents with a high level of parental involvement ate significantly more FV at follow-up compared to students with a low level/no parental involvement. Parental involvement in interventions may improve adolescents' FV intake if challenges of implementation can be overcome.

trial registrationISRCTN11666034 . Registered 06/01/2012. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFruitParentsSchool Health ServicesVegetablesAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthDenmarkDietFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdolescentsFruit and vegetable intakeParental involvementProcess evaluationSchool intervention

Identifiers

PMID27782838
PMCPMC5080706
OpenAlexW2538263853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.