Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782827›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2016

A statistical approach for identifying differential distributions in single-cell RNA-seq experiments.

Keegan D Korthauer, Li-Fang Chu, Michael A Newton, Yuan Li, James Thomson, Ron Stewart, Christina Kendziorski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keegan D KorthauerDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, 02215, MA, USA.
Li-Fang ChuMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA.
Michael A NewtonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA.
Yuan LiDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA.
James ThomsonMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA.
Ron StewartMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA.
Christina KendziorskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, USA. kendzior@biostat.wisc.edu.

Funding

TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Midwest Progenitor Cell ConsortiumU01HL099773 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI THOMSON, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Retinal tissue chips for ocular disease modelingUH3TR000506 · NCATS · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI THOMSON, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2014 to 2016
$6.2M
Statistical methods for spatial RNA sequencing experimentsR01GM102756 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KENDZIORSKI, CHRISTINA · 2012 to 2024
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000506NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099773NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to quantify cellular heterogeneity is a major advantage of single-cell technologies. However, statistical methods often treat cellular heterogeneity as a nuisance. We present a novel method to characterize differences in expression in the presence of distinct expression states within and among biological conditions. We demonstrate that this framework can detect differential expression patterns under a wide range of settings. Compared to existing approaches, this method has higher power to detect subtle differences in gene expression distributions that are more complex than a mean shift, and can characterize those differences. The freely available R package scDD implements the approach.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNASequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNACellular heterogeneityDifferential expressionMixture modelingSingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID27782827
PMCPMC5080738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.