Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782825›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2016

Antenatal psychosocial risk status and Australian women's use of primary care and specialist mental health services in the year after birth: a prospective study.

Virginia Schmied, Rachel Langdon, Stephen Matthey, Lynn Kemp, Marie-Paule Austin, Maree Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BMJ open · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia SchmiedSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith, Sydney, 2751, NSW, Australia. v.schmied@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-1781
Rachel LangdonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith, Sydney, 2751, NSW, Australia.
Stephen MattheySchool of Psychology, University of Sydney and Research Director, Infant, Child & Adolescent Mental Health Service, South West Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Lynn KempSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith, Sydney, 2751, NSW, Australia.
Marie-Paule AustinChair, Perinatal Mental Health Unit University of New South Wales & St John of God Health Care, Burwood , Sydney, Australia.
Maree JohnsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ingham Institute · AUWestern Sydney University · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor mental health in the perinatal period can impact negatively on women, their infants and families. Australian State and Territory governments are investing in routine psychosocial assessment and depression screening with referral to services and support, however, little is known about how well these services are used. The aim of this paper is to report on the health services used by women for their physical and mental health needs from pregnancy to 12 months after birth and to compare service use for women who have been identified in pregnancy as having moderate-high psychosocial risk with those with low psychosocial risk.

methodsOne hundred and six women were recruited to a prospective longitudinal study with five points of data collection (2-4 weeks after prenatal booking, 36 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum and 12 months postpartum) was undertaken. Data were collected via face-to-face and telephone interviews, relating to psychosocial risk factors, mental health and service use. The prenatal psychosocial risk status of women (data available for 83 of 106 women) was determined using the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire (ANRQ) and was used to compare socio-demographic characteristics and service use of women with 'low' and 'moderate to high' risk of perinatal mental health problems.

resultsThe findings indicate high use of postnatal universal health services (child and family health nurses, general practitioners) by both groups of women, with limited use of specialist mental health services by women identified with moderate to high risk of mental health problems. While almost all respondents indicated that they would seek help for mental health concerns most had a preference to seek help from partners and family before accessing health professionals.

conclusionThese preliminary data support local and international studies that highlight the poor uptake of specialist services for mental health problems in postnatal women, where this may be required. Further research comparing larger samples of women (with low and psychosocial high risk) are needed to explore the extent of any differences and the reasons why women do not access these specialist services.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAustraliaDepression, PostpartumFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental Health ServicesMothersPregnancyPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesChild and family health nursingGeneral practiceHealth services researchMental health servicesMidwiferyPerinatal mental healthService utilisation

Identifiers

PMID27782825
PMCPMC5078921
OpenAlexW2536176317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.