Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782813›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Additive value of pre-operative and one-month post-operative lymphocyte count for death-risk stratification in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer: a multicentric study.

Christelle d'Engremont, Dewi Vernerey, Anne-Laure Pointet, Gaël Simone, Francine Fein, Bruno Heyd, Stéphane Koch, Lucine Vuitton, Stefano Kim, Marine Jary and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systemic immune inflammation index with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a meta-analysis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Christelle d'EngremontDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Dewi VernereyMethodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Anne-Laure PointetDepartment of Gastroenterology and GI oncology, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Gaël SimoneDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Francine FeinDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Bruno HeydDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Stéphane KochDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Lucine VuittonDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Stefano KimDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Marine JaryDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Najib LamfichekDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of Belfort-Montbeliard, Montbeliard, France.
Celia TurcoDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Zaher LakkisDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Anne BergerDepartment of GI Surgery, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Franck BonnetainMethodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Julien TaiebDepartment of Gastroenterology and GI oncology, Paris Descartes University, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Philippe BachellierDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Christophe BorgDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France. christophe.borg@efs.sante.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRMethodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRInserm · FRUniversité de technologie de belfort-montbéliard · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) incidence is increasing worldwide. Several studies have shown that lymphopenia was correlated with a poor prognosis but the potential interest to measure lymphopenia in the pre and post-operative setting as well as its added value among conventional prognostic factors was never investigated.

methodsData from two independent cohorts in whom patients underwent resection for pancreatic carcinoma were retrospectively recorded. We examined the association between perioperative findings, pre and post-operative lymphocyte counts and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analyses. Performance assessment and internal validation of the final model were evaluated with Harrell's C-index, calibration plot and bootstrap sample procedures.

resultsThree hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis between 2000 and 2011. Pre and post-operative lymphocyte counts were independent prognostic factors associated with OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0128 and p = 0.0764, respectively). The addition of lymphocyte count variable to the conventional parameters identified in multivariate analysis (metastatic lymph node ratio, veinous emboli and adjuvant chemotherapy) significantly improved the model discrimination capacity (bootstrap mean difference = 0.04; 95 % CI, 0.01-0.06). The use of a threshold and combining the categorical (≥1000; <1000) information in pre and post lymphocyte counts permitted the identification of 4 subgroups of patients with different prognosis (p < 0.0001). Finally, the description of patients in long-term remission showed that only 3 of 65 (4.6 %) patients with post-operative lymphocyte count under 1000/mm

conclusionPre and post-operative lymphopenia are independent prognostic factors for OS and they have an additive value regarding conventional prognostic factors for death-risk stratification and to predict long-term survival. Lymphopenia should be included as stratification factors in future clinical trial assessing overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte CountAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersLymphocyte countLymphopeniaPancreatic adenocarcinomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27782813
PMCPMC5080693
OpenAlexW2534958209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.