Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782807›Full record

ReviewBMC plant biology2016

DAMPs, MAMPs, and NAMPs in plant innate immunity.

Hyong Woo Choi, Daniel F Klessig

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
34.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 326 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. HarnessingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. ACurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reinforced Defenses:International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. CaEMBO reports · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response of Avocado toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyong Woo ChoiBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, 533 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Daniel F KlessigBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, 533 Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. dfk8@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulticellular organisms have evolved systems/mechanisms to detect various forms of danger, including attack by microbial pathogens and a variety of pests, as well as tissue and cellular damage. Detection via cell-surface receptors activates an ancient and evolutionarily conserved innate immune system.

resultPotentially harmful microorganisms are recognized by the presence of molecules or parts of molecules that have structures or chemical patterns unique to microbes and thus are perceived as non-self/foreign. They are referred to as Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs). Recently, a class of small molecules that is made only by nematodes, and that functions as pheromones in these organisms, was shown to be recognized by a wide range of plants. In the presence of these molecules, termed Nematode-Associated Molecular Patterns (NAMPs), plants activate innate immune responses and display enhanced resistance to a broad spectrum of microbial and nematode pathogens. In addition to pathogen attack, the relocation of various endogenous molecules or parts of molecules, generally to the extracellular milieu, as a result of tissue or cellular damage is perceived as a danger signal, and it leads to the induction of innate immune responses. These relocated endogenous inducers are called Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs).

conclusionsThis mini-review is focused on plant DAMPs, including the recently discovered Arabidopsis HMGB3, which is the counterpart of the prototypic animal DAMP HMGB1. The plant DAMPs will be presented in the context of plant MAMPs and NAMPs, as well as animal DAMPs.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsImmunity, InnatePlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityArabidopsis ProteinsDAMPsDefenseInnate immunityMAMPsNAMPsPAMPsReceptorsSalicylic acid

Identifiers

PMID27782807
PMCPMC5080799
OpenAlexW2532404196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.