Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27782770›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2017

New experimental models of the blood-brain barrier for CNS drug discovery.

Mohammad A Kaisar, Ravi K Sajja, Shikha Prasad, Vinay V Abhyankar, Taylor Liles, Luca Cucullo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Biomimetic Human Multi-Cellular In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. 3DFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad A Kaisara Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , TX , USA.
Ravi K Sajjaa Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , TX , USA.
Shikha Prasada Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , TX , USA.
Vinay V Abhyankarc Biological Microsystems Division at The University of Texas at Arlington Research Institute , Fort Worth , TX , USA.
Taylor Lilesa Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , TX , USA.
Luca Cuculloa Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , TX , USA.

Funding

Testing tobacco smoke toxicity at the blood-brain barrierR01DA029121 · NIDA · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI ABBRUSCATO, THOMAS J, CUCULLO, LUCA · 2011 to 2021
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a dynamic biological interface which actively controls the passage of substances between the blood and the central nervous system (CNS). From a biological and functional standpoint, the BBB plays a crucial role in maintaining brain homeostasis inasmuch that deterioration of BBB functions are prodromal to many CNS disorders. Conversely, the BBB hinders the delivery of drugs targeting the brain to treat a variety of neurological diseases. Area covered: This article reviews recent technological improvements and innovation in the field of BBB modeling including static and dynamic cell-based platforms, microfluidic systems and the use of stem cells and 3D printing technologies. Additionally, the authors laid out a roadmap for the integration of microfluidics and stem cell biology as a holistic approach for the development of novel in vitro BBB platforms. Expert opinion: Development of effective CNS drugs has been hindered by the lack of reliable strategies to mimic the BBB and cerebrovascular impairments in vitro. Technological advancements in BBB modeling have fostered the development of highly integrative and quasi- physiological in vitro platforms to support the process of drug discovery. These advanced in vitro tools are likely to further current understanding of the cerebrovascular modulatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCentral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System DiseasesDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPrinting, Three-DimensionalStem CellsCentral Nervous System Agentsalternativebrainbrain disorderscell culturecerebrovasculardrug testingIn vitropermeabilitytechnology

Identifiers

PMID27782770
PMCPMC5521006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.